The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues

The generation effect is the greater memorability of a response that is actively produced (e.g., in answering a question from memory) than one that is more passively produced (as in reading the answer). The present three experiments addressed a question that is critical to the theoretical interpretation of the generation effect: Is memory enhanced for the cues that are used to elicit generated responses? Using incidental learning procedures, Experiments 1 and 2 gave an affirmative answer (although the effect was substantially weaker than the generation effect for responses). Enhancement of memory for generation cues was observed both in a within-subject/within-list design (reading and generation items within the same trial blocks; Experiment 1) and in a between-subjects design (reading and generation tasks for different groups of subjects; Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, memory enhancement for generation cues was used to produce a previously unobtained result—a generation effect for nonsense responses under incidental learning conditions. These findings provide critical evidence required by theories that interpret the generation effect in terms of enhanced processing of the cue-response item.

[1]  L. A. McElroy,et al.  Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect , 1982 .

[2]  J. Hampton,et al.  Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. , 1985 .

[3]  D. G. Payne,et al.  The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Watkins,et al.  Generation effect with an incidental memorization procedure , 1988 .

[5]  Norman J. Slamucka,et al.  The generation effect when generation fails , 1983 .

[6]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? , 1986, Psychological review.

[7]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[8]  Peter Graf,et al.  Two consequences of generating: Increased inter- and intraword organization of sentences , 1980 .

[9]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[10]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[11]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory ☆ , 1988 .

[12]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[13]  William A. Ahroon,et al.  Procedures for computing d’ and \ , 1977 .

[14]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Word association norms , 1964 .

[15]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[16]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  The Self as a Memory System : Powerful , but Ordinary , 2022 .

[17]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The Generation Effect: Support for a Two-Factor Theory , 1988 .

[18]  Elizabeth E. Johns,et al.  The generation effect with nonwords. , 1988 .