Desarrollo y Validación de un Conjunto de Rúbricas para la Evaluación de Trabajos Fin de Grado

La realizacion del Trabajo Fin de Grado (TFG) es una tarea complicada tanto para el profesorado como para el alumnado universitario. Experiencias previas en la direccion de los extintos Proyectos Fin de Carrera en titulaciones vinculadas a la Ingenieria Informatica han puesto de manifiesto que la falta de transparencia en el proceso de calificacion es un problema que afecta a todos los implicados en el desarrollo y evaluacion de dichos proyectos. En un intento de hacer frente a este problema y facilitar la labor tanto del profesorado como del alumnado, en este trabajo se presenta el desarrollo y validacion de un conjunto de rubricas para la evaluacion de TFGs en el campo de la Ingenieria Informatica. Las principales aportaciones de este trabajo son la identificacion de las tareas que se deben evaluar, sus pesos en la calificacion final y la necesidad de aportar diferentes tipos de rubricas para poder lidiar con las preferencias del profesorado.

[1]  Richard Taylor.  Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient: A Basic Review , 1990 .

[2]  A. Nesbitt,et al.  Quality Assessment of BSc Engineering Honours Projects at Glasgow Caledonian University , 2005 .

[3]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[4]  Ainhoa Alvarez,et al.  Adjusting the weights of assessment elements in the evaluation of Final Year Projects , 2015, EDM.

[5]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement. , 2000 .

[6]  Kai Petersen,et al.  Improving Students With Rubric-Based Self-Assessment and Oral Feedback , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[7]  Jann E. Freed,et al.  Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning , 1999 .

[8]  Michael B. Twidale,et al.  Redressing the balance: the advantages of informal evaluation techniques for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1993 .

[9]  E. Valderrama,et al.  Guidelines for the final year project assessment in engineering , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[10]  Dannelle D. Stevens,et al.  Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning , 2004 .

[11]  Barbara Peat.  Integrating Writing and Research Skills: Development and Testing of a Rubric to Measure Student Outcomes , 2006 .

[12]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[13]  Darryl M. Hunter.  The Use of Holistic versus Analytic Scoring for Large-Scale Assessment of Writing , 1996, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

[14]  Anders Jonsson,et al.  The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences , 2007 .

[15]  S. Brookhart.  The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The Missing Part of Pedagogy , 1999 .

[16]  Esperanza Marcos,et al.  An Approach to the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Software Engineering Research , 2006, PhiSE.

[17]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[18]  J. L. Sanchez,et al.  Evaluation of transversal competences in the final year project in engineering , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of the 22nd EAEEIE Annual Conference (EAEEIE).

[19]  Catherine M. Wehlburg.  Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data , 2006 .

[20]  Anders Jonsson,et al.  The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review. , 2013 .

[21]  Ana Arruarte Lasa,et al.  Dealing with common problems in engineering degrees' Final Year Projects , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[22]  Pau Fonseca i Casas,et al.  Evaluation and assessment of professional skills in the Final Year Project , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[23]  T. Chai,et al.  Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature , 2014 .

[24]  Guy Littlefair,et al.  BE (Hons) final year project assessment - leaving out the subjectiveness , 2008 .

[25]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Scoring Rubrics: What, When and How? , 2000 .