Do ' liberal market economies ' really innovate more radically than ' coordinated market economies ' ? Hall &

In their influential book Varieties of Capitalism; The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Peter A. Hall and David Soskice argue that the technological specialization patterns of developed countries are largely determined by the “varieties of capitalism” prevailing in these countries. They hypothesize that “liberal market economies” (LMEs) specialize in radical innovation, while “coordinated market economies” (CMEs) focus more on incremental innovation. We argue that Hall and Soskice’s empirical test of this hypothesis is fundamentally flawed and propose a more appropriate and rigorous test of their conjecture, based on patent citation data. The manufacturingwide industry-level results indicate that the hypothesis does not survive further scrutiny.

[1]  Sungchang Jung,et al.  The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case study of patent statistics , 2002 .

[2]  E. Frankema The Colonial Origins of Inequality: Exploring the Causes and Consequences of Land Distribution , 2006 .

[3]  Measuring and Analysing Educational Inequality: The Distribution of Grade Enrolment Rates in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa , 2006 .

[4]  Bart van Ark,et al.  Catching up or getting stuck? Europe's troubles to exploit ICT's productivity potential , 2006 .

[5]  L. Kenworthy Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance , 2006 .

[6]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation , 2000 .

[7]  M. Timmer,et al.  Productivity Levels in Distributive Trades: A New ICOP Dataset for OECD Countries , 2006 .

[8]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[9]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[10]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[11]  Bart van Ark,et al.  Does the European Union need to revive productivity growth , 2005 .

[12]  Harry X. Wu,et al.  "Losing ground" : Japanese labour productivity and unit laboour cost manufacturing in comparison to the U.S. , 2003 .

[13]  H. D. Jong,et al.  Industrial output and labour productivity in the Netherlands, 1913-1929: some neglected issues , 1994 .

[14]  David Soskice,et al.  An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[15]  M. Caniels Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth , 2000 .

[16]  P. Groote,et al.  A standardised time series of the stock of fixed capital in the Netherlands, 1900-1995 , 1996 .

[17]  Andrew Griffiths,et al.  Institutional Governance Systems And Variations In National Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Framework , 2005 .

[18]  A. Hofman Latin American economic development.: A causal analysis in historical perspective , 1998 .

[19]  Harald Edquist,et al.  The Swedish ICT miracle - myth or reality? , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[20]  B. Ark,et al.  Comparative Productivity in East and West German Manufacturing before Reunification , 1993 .

[21]  Harry X. Wu Comparative labour productivity performance in Chinese manufacturing, 1952-1997 : an ICOP PPP approach , 2001 .

[22]  M. Timmer,et al.  Manufacturing Performance in Indonesia, South Korea and Taiwan before and after the Crisis. An international Perspective, 1980-2000 , 2003 .

[23]  N. Mulder,et al.  The International Comparison of Performance in Distribution: Value Added, Labour Productivity and PPPs in Mexican and US Wholesale and Retail Trade 1975/7 , 1993 .

[24]  S. Breschi,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis , 2000 .

[25]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks , 2005 .

[26]  C. Castaldi,et al.  The Properties of Sectoral Growth : Evidence from Four Large European Economies , 2006 .

[27]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[28]  Martin Rhodes,et al.  EMU and Labor Market Institutions in Europe , 2005 .

[29]  Steven Casper,et al.  NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND THE HYBRIDIZATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS MODELS: THE GERMAN AND UK BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTORS , 2001 .

[30]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[31]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[32]  Rainer Fremdling The German Industrial Census of 1936. Statistics as Preparation for the War , 2003 .

[33]  N. Mulder Transport and Communication in Mexico and the United States: Value Added, Purchasing Power Parities and Productivity , 1994 .

[34]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[35]  D. Pilat The economics of catch up : the experience of Japan and Korea , 1993 .

[36]  M. Kitson The American Economic Model and European Economic Policy , 2005 .

[37]  N. Mulder Output and Productivity in Brazilian Distribution : A Comparative View , 1994 .

[38]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[39]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  The role of human resource management in cross-border mergers and acquisitions , 2004 .

[40]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  ICT and Europe's Productivity Performance: Industry-Level Growth Account Comparisons with the United States , 2005 .

[41]  Prices, Real Value Added and Productivity in Dutch Manufacturing, 1921-1960 , 1993 .

[42]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[43]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data , 1992 .

[44]  V. P. Bhapkar,et al.  On the analysis of contingency tables with a quantitative response. , 1968, Biometrics.

[45]  George van Leeuwen,et al.  LIFETIMES OF MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM DUTCH MANUFACTURING , 2008 .

[46]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[47]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[48]  G. Jong An International Comparison of Real Output and Labour Productivity in Manufacturing in Ecuador and the United States , 1994 .

[49]  M. Taylor Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation , 2004, International Organization.

[50]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Technology Spillovers between Sectors and over Time. , 1999 .

[51]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[52]  N. Mulder New Perspectives on Service Output and Productivity: A Comparison of French and US Productivity in Transport, Communications Wholesale and Retail Trade , 1994 .

[53]  B. Ark The Productivity Problem of the Dutch Economy: Implications for Economic and Social Policies and Business Strategy , 2003 .

[54]  R. Inklaar Cyclical Productivity in Europe and the United States: Evaluating the Evidence on Returns to Scale and Input Utilization , 2006 .

[55]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Geographic Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations , 1993 .

[57]  P. Groote,et al.  Can growth theory contribute to our understanding of nineteenth century economic dynamics , 1994 .

[58]  P. Groote,et al.  Output responses to infrastructure investment in the Netherlands, 1850-1913 , 1995 .

[59]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance , 2007 .

[60]  M. Timmer On the Reliability of Unit Value Ratios in International Comparisons , 1996 .

[61]  R. Hill,et al.  Standard Errors as Weights in Multilateral Price Indexes , 2006 .

[62]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  Mind the Gap! International Comparisons of Productivity in Services and Goods Production , 2007 .