Practice of Epidemiology Validation of a New Brief Physical Activity Survey among Men and Women Aged 60 – 69 Years

The Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS), a new two-item physical activity survey, and the Stanford Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall (PAR) questionnaire were administered to men and women, aged 60-69 years, in the Atherosclerotic Disease VAscular functioN and genetiC Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study. Frequency distributions of SBAS activity levels, as well as a receiver operating curve, were calculated to determine if the SBAS can detect recommended physical activity levels of 150 or more minutes/week at moderate or greater intensity, with PAR minutes/week. Data were collected between December 2001 and January 2004 from 1,010 participants (38% women) and recorded. Subjects were 65.8 (standard deviation: 2.8) years of age, 77% were married, 55% were retired, 23% were college graduates, and 68% were Caucasian. SBAS scores related significantly in an expected manner to PAR minutes/week (p < 0.01), energy expenditure (kcal/kg per day) (p < 0.01), and selected cardiovascular disease risk biomarkers (p < 0.01). The SBAS of physical activity at moderate intensity had a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.61. The SBAS is a quick assessment of the usual amount and intensity of physical activity that a person performs throughout the day. The SBAS needs further validation in other populations but demonstrated the potential of being a reasonably valid and inexpensive tool for quickly assessing habitual physical activity in large-scale epidemiology studies and clinical practice.

[1]  K. Vranizan,et al.  Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose response. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure from physical activity measures: determinants of accuracy. , 2001, Obesity research.

[4]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  M. Booth,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity: An International Perspective , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  P. Thompson,et al.  ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1995 .

[7]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Estimating energy expenditure from the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity and Tecumseh Occupational Activity questionnaires - a doubly labeled water validation. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  J. Donnelly,et al.  The validity of the Stanford Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall in young adults. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[10]  S. Oparil,et al.  Physical activity and cardiovascular health , 1996 .

[11]  D. Brodie,et al.  The Assessment of Physical Activity by Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaires , 1990, Sports medicine.

[12]  W L Haskell,et al.  Methodologic issues in measuring physical activity and physical fitness when evaluating the role of dietary supplements for physically active people. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  W. Saris,et al.  Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  J. Sallis,et al.  Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validation of the Stanford 7-day recall to assess habitual physical activity. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[16]  Y Schutz,et al.  Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: an overview of currently available and proposed new measures. , 2001, Obesity research.

[17]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  A. Bauman,et al.  Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[19]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  L. Appel,et al.  A comparison of the Yale Physical Activity Survey with other physical activity measures. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  J. Kampert,et al.  Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  J. Lacour,et al.  Simultaneous Validation of Ten Physical Activity Questionnaires in Older Men: A Doubly Labeled Water Study , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  R. Dishman,et al.  Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d re-call of physical activity in college students. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.