Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State

In the present study two separate stimulus–response compatibility effects (functional affordance and Simon-like effects) were investigated with centrally presented pictures of an object tool (a torch) characterized by a structural separation between the graspable portion and the goal-directed portion. In Experiment 1, participants were required to decide whether the torch was red or blue, while in Experiment 2 they were required to decide whether the torch was upright or inverted. Our results showed that with the same stimulus two types of compatibility effect emerged: one based on the direction signalled by the goal-directed portion of the tool (a Simon-like effect as observed in Experiment 1), and the other based on the actions associated with an object (a functional affordance effect as observed in Experiment 2). Both effects emerged independently of the person's intention to act on the stimulus, but depended on the stimulus properties that were processed in order to perform the task.

[1]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  C F Michaels,et al.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[6]  C. Michaels.  Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: a reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Michaels.  Destination Compatibility, Affordances, and Coding Rules: A Reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks , 1993 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  M. Jeannerod.  The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[13]  H. Masaki,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[15]  S. Anderson,et al.  Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  R. Ward,et al.  S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .

[17]  A. H. Feiveson,et al.  Power by Simulation , 2002 .

[18]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey.  Taking action : cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts , 2003 .

[19]  U. Ansorge.  Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction , 2003 .

[20]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Ed Symes,et al.  Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances , 2005 .

[26]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application , 2006 .

[27]  Garry Young,et al.  Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  J. Decety,et al.  The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior , 2006, Brain Research.

[29]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  Software for generating psychological experiments. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[30]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Spatial coding and central patterns: is there something special about the eyes? , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[32]  Rob Ellis,et al.  The role of visual attention in action priming , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[34]  K. Jellinger.  Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[35]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[36]  L. Riggio,et al.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[37]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  An Attentional Mechanism for Selecting Appropriate Actions Afforded by Graspable Objects , 2008, Psychological science.

[38]  Lucia Riggio,et al.  Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances , 2009, Brain Research.

[39]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Parietal modules for reaching , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  The Simon effect with conventional signals: a time-course analysis. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[41]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Motor abstraction: a neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood , 2009, Psychological research.

[42]  R. Proctor,et al.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent? , 2011 .

[44]  Marius V. Peelen,et al.  On the Role of Object Information in Action Observation: An fMRI Study , 2010, Cerebral cortex.