Variation in output power of laser prostatectomy fibers: a need for power measurements.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was the assessment of the quality of side-firing fibers that are being used for laser prostatectomy, either by a laser light transmission measurement or by visual inspection. METHODS A power meter (Aquarius) was developed to measure the actual power transmitted through a side-firing fiber and delivered to the prostatic tissue. The power measurements were performed under clinical conditions, that is, under water and at relatively high input power. Furthermore, a protocol was developed for visual inspection of the fibers. Eight types of side-firing fibers were measured before use. Before and after a procedure, three fiber types were measured: ProLase II (28 samples), UltraLine (23 samples), and UroLase (44 samples). All these fibers were used in standard treatment protocols. RESULTS At 60 W the transmission of new fibers (not used) ranged between 49% and 83% when compared to a bare fiber. After use, a large variation was found in transmitted power between different samples of one device. A correlation with total transmitted power was not present. At higher power input, vapor bubbles are generated at the tip of the fibers. Depending on the fiber design, these bubbles have a major impact on the transmission. Only for the UroLase fiber was there a significant correlation between visual inspection and the transmission of used samples at 10, 20, and 40 W. CONCLUSIONS The transmission strongly varies between fibers and between different samples of one fiber during clinical use. Moreover, the transmission does not correlate with visual inspection. A power measurement during a clinical treatment will contribute to a more controlled procedure and to a better comparison of clinical laser prostatectomy studies.

[1]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Laser prostatectomy performed with a right-angle firing neodymium:YAG laser fiber at 60 watts power setting. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Clarence A. Rawlings,et al.  Effect of intraprostatic blood flow on laser energy penetration in the canine prostate , 1995, Photonics West.

[3]  J. Mooibroek,et al.  Optimization of laser prostatectomy. , 1994, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[4]  R Muschter,et al.  The optimization of laser prostatectomy. Part I: Free beam side fire coagulation. , 1994, Urology.

[5]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser dosimetry for the prolase II side-firing delivery system in the human prostate. , 1995, Urology.

[6]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Neodymium:YAG laser coagulation prostatectomy: 3 years of experience with 227 patients. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[7]  M. V. van Gemert,et al.  Explosive onset of continuous wave laser tissue ablation. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  R. Price,et al.  Pathologic changes occurring in the prostate following transurethral laser prostatectomy , 1992, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[9]  Christiaan F. P. van Swol,et al.  Monitoring of the quality of side-firing fibers using a special design power meter: Aquarius , 1995, Photonics West.

[10]  M. Terris,et al.  Dosimetry studies utilizing the urolase right‐angle firing Neodymium: YAG laser fiber in the human prostate , 1996, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  Flavio Trigo-Rocha,et al.  Laser prostatectomy using a right angle delivery system , 1995, Photonics West.

[12]  G. Buonaccorsi,et al.  A comparative optical analysis of laser side-firing devices: a guide to treatment. , 1995, British journal of urology.

[13]  R. Roth,et al.  Transurethral ultrasound-guided laser-induced prostatectomy (TULIP procedure): a canine prostate feasibility study. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[14]  S. Torp-Pedersen,et al.  Percutaneous ablation of canine prostate using transrectal ultrasound guidance. Absolute ethanol and Nd:YAG laser. , 1988, Investigative radiology.