Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects

After 25 years of sales, glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) is the world's biggest selling and fastest growing agrochemical. Glyphosate has many strengths, particularly its systemicity and ability to control perennial weeds, which have facilitated its role as an essential tool in modern agriculture. Surveys of recent scientific and patent literature point to several key areas of current and future interest in glyphosate and its use. Biotechnology topics have been the most popular, but there is still much interest in the molecule per se, particularly in manufacturing processes. The mode of action and physiology of glyphosate are common subjects. More applied aspects concern the development of formulations with new adjuvants, or mixtures with other herbicides, to enhance performance. An increasing number of papers are reporting on its environmental fate and on agronomic techniques designed to improve the efficiency of application and minimise its environmental impact. Lack of weed resistance is a key feature of glyphosate despite its widespread use. However, differential levels of tolerance between species have led to changes in weed succession. There is a need to develop integrated weed management systems in which glyphosate still plays a key role. Glyphosate is an exceedingly effective herbicide and presents a considerable challenge to the development of new herbicides for sustainable cropping systems and situations in which cost-effective and environmentally considerate weed control is required.

[1]  G. D. Wills Factors Affecting Toxicity and Translocation of Glyphosate in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1978, Weed Science.

[2]  C. Mcwhorter,et al.  Translocation of 14C-Glyphosate in Soybeans (Glycine max) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) , 1980, Weed Science.

[3]  J. Caseley,et al.  Influence of glyphosate on selected plant processes , 1983 .

[4]  S. Weller,et al.  Differential Susceptibility of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Biotypes to Glyphosate , 1984, Weed Science.

[5]  S. Weller,et al.  Heritability of glyphosate susceptibility among biotypes of field bindweed , 1987 .

[6]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Salt Antagonism of Glyphosate , 1991, Weed Science.

[7]  M. Devine,et al.  A scanning electron microscope study of glyphosate deposits in relation to foliar uptake , 1991 .

[8]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Spray Droplet Residual of Glyphosate in Various Carriers , 1992, Weed Science.

[9]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Physiological changes induced in birch seedlings by sublethal applications of glyphosate , 1992 .

[10]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .

[11]  R. Matysiak,et al.  Surfactant and salt affect glyphosate retention and absorption , 1996 .

[12]  Rj Taylor,et al.  Use of glyphosate to prevent development of reproductive tillers and extend vegetative growth of bent grass (Agrostis castellana) , 1996 .

[13]  D. Penner,et al.  Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides , 1997, Weed Science.

[14]  K. Al-Khatib,et al.  Wine grape (Vitis vinifera) response to fall exposure of simulated drift from selected herbicides , 1997 .

[15]  K. Gruys,et al.  UNDERSTANDING GLYPHOSATE'S MOLECULAR MODE OF ACTION WITH EPSP SYNTHASE : EVIDENCE FAVORING AN ALLOSTERIC INHIBITOR MODEL , 1997 .

[16]  J. Westwood,et al.  Cellular mechanisms influence differential glyphosate sensitivity in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes , 1997, Weed Science.

[17]  S. Padgette,et al.  Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance , 1997, Weed Technology.

[18]  C. W. Lindwall,et al.  Merits of a weed-sensing sprayer to control weeds in conservation fallow and cropping systems , 1998 .

[19]  G. Marshall,et al.  Herbicide-tolerant crops - Real farmer opportunity or potential environmental problem , 1998 .

[20]  Dale L. Shaner,et al.  Rapid Determination of Glyphosate Injury to Plants and Identification of Glyphosate-Resistant Plants , 1998, Weed Technology.

[21]  C. W. Lindwall,et al.  Factors affecting the operation of the weed-sensing Detectspray system , 1998, Weed Science.

[22]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia , 1998, Weed Science.

[23]  S. Adkins,et al.  Influence of environmental factors on glyphosate efficacy when applied to Avena fatua or Urochloa panicoides , 1998 .

[24]  Gavin John Hall,et al.  Plants as sources of cations antagonistic to glyphosate activity , 2000 .

[25]  Allan T Woodburn,et al.  Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwide , 2000 .

[26]  Lim Jung Lee,et al.  A first report of glyphosate‐resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L) Gaertn) in Malaysia , 2000 .