EPIPAGE 2: a preterm birth cohort in France in 2011

BackgroundChildren born at low gestational ages face a range of risks and number of neonates surviving very preterm birth is increasing. We present the objectives and methods of a French national cohort of very and moderately preterm children, the EPIPAGE 2 study. It aims to examine short- and long-term outcomes of very preterm children and their determinants.Methods/DesignEligible participants for this prospective population-based study include all infants live born or stillborn and all terminations of pregnancy between 22 and 31 completed weeks of gestation in all the maternity units in 25 French regions. In addition, a sample of moderate preterm births, i.e. births and late terminations at 32–34 weeks, was included in the same regions. In all, 7804 babies (stillbirths and live births) and terminations of pregnancy out of 8400 eligible births in France in 2011 that were either very (22–31 weeks) or moderately preterm (32–34 weeks) were included. Data on pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal events were extracted from the obstetric and neonatal records. The follow-up will collect information at corrected ages of one and 2 years and at 5, 8, and 12 years of age. Of the 4467 children discharged alive from the hospital and eligible for follow-up, 155 (4%) families refused further follow-up and 22 died before one-year of age. Finally, 4290 were included in the follow-up.Eight additional projects investigating specific hypotheses among subsamples of the cohort by collecting specific data in addition to the core cohort data are being conducted to investigate 1) diagnosis of histologic chorioamnionitis, 2) early biomarkers of child health, 3) attitudes of care for extremely preterm infants, 4) painful procedures in neonatal intensive care units, 5) neonatal MRI cerebral abnormalities and their relation to executive functions, 6) associations between early gut colonization and early and late onset diseases, 7) impact of neonatal nutrition on child development, and 8) mother-infant attachment.DiscussionThis project seeks to provide new data on the prognosis and etiology of very preterm birth and to assess related medical practices. Accordingly, it should lead to the development of new strategies of management and prevention in high-risk babies.

[1]  References , 1971 .

[2]  G. Breart,et al.  Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study , 2008, The Lancet.

[3]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Recent trends in visual impairment and blindness in the UK , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[4]  K. Joseph,et al.  Trends in Preterm Birth and Perinatal Mortality Among Singletons: United States, 1989 Through 2000 , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Bradley N Manktelow,et al.  Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5 , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  D. Wechsler.  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children , 2020, Definitions.

[7]  B Hagberg,et al.  The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. IX. Prevalence and origin in the birth‐year period 1995–1998 , 1996, Acta paediatrica.

[8]  Damian D. Jones.  Gender Differences in Cognitive Ability of Children with Hearing Impairment on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-3rd Edition , 1995 .

[9]  Martin Melchers,et al.  Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children , 2015 .

[10]  L. Doyle,et al.  Outcomes at age 2 years of infants < 28 weeks' gestational age born in Victoria in 2005. , 2010, The Journal of pediatrics.

[11]  C. Cans.  Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  W. Poole,et al.  Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  A. Eliasson,et al.  The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. , 2006, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[14]  Hugo Lagercrantz,et al.  One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. , 2009, JAMA.

[15]  P. Auquier,et al.  KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents , 2005, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[16]  BMC Pediatrics , 2005 .

[17]  Stéphanie Vandentorren,et al.  Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study , 2009, BMC pediatrics.

[18]  R. Palisano,et al.  Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[19]  K. Himmelmann,et al.  The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. X. Prevalence and origin in the birth‐year period 1999–2002 , 2010, Acta paediatrica.

[20]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies) , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  P. Melchers,et al.  Kaufman-Assessment Battery for Children Differenzierende Beurteilung der intellektuellen (Teil)leistungsfähigkeit geistig behinderter Erwachsener , 1998, Der Nervenarzt.

[22]  J. Stockman.  One-Year Survival of Extremely Preterm Infants After Active Perinatal Care in Sweden , 2011 .

[23]  A. Rønnestad,et al.  Early Death, Morbidity, and Need of Treatment Among Extremely Premature Infants , 2005, Pediatrics.

[24]  N. Lelong,et al.  [Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2010: Results from the National Perinatal Surveys]. , 2012, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[25]  L. Wendt,et al.  The Changing Panorama of Cerebral Palsy in Sweden , 1989, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[26]  N. Marlow,et al.  Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  G. Breart,et al.  Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study , 2004, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[28]  G. Surman,et al.  Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight (<1500 g) or born prematurely (<32 weeks) in 16 European centres: a database study , 2007, The Lancet.

[29]  B. Poindexter,et al.  Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants From the NICHD Neonatal Research Network , 2010, Pediatrics.

[30]  Saroj Saigal,et al.  An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood , 2008, The Lancet.

[31]  R. Goodman,et al.  Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[32]  K. Joseph,et al.  Increasing Prevalence of Cerebral Palsy Among Very Preterm Infants: A Population-Based Study , 2006, Pediatrics.

[33]  J. Stockman.  Exercise Training Program in Children and Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009 .

[34]  H. Roeyers,et al.  Outcome at 3 Years of Age in a Population-Based Cohort of Extremely Preterm Infants , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children , 2010 .

[36]  P. Ancel,et al.  Changes in care and outcome of very preterm babies in the Parisian region between 1998 and 2003 , 2009, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.