A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Miller. Some psychological studies of grammar. , 1962 .
[2] G. A. Miller,et al. Finitary models of language users , 1963 .
[3] Eugene Galanter,et al. Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .
[4] George A. Miller,et al. Free Recall of Self-Embedded English Sentences , 1964, Inf. Control..
[5] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[6] Walter S. Stolz,et al. A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences , 1967 .
[7] Lawrence E. Marks,et al. Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences , 1968 .
[8] P. A. Reich. The Finiteness of Natural Language , 1969 .
[9] Marilyn D. Wang. The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility , 1970 .
[10] D. J. Foss,et al. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure reconsidered , 1970 .
[11] Donald J. Foss,et al. Some effects of memory limitation upon sentence comprehension and recall , 1970 .
[12] J. Deese,et al. Comprehensibility and Subject-Verb Relations in Complex Sentences. , 1971 .
[13] Jean-Michel Peterfalvi,et al. L'acceptabilité des phrases , 1971 .
[14] J. Kimball. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .
[15] A. Powell,et al. Semantic Clues in Comprehension of Novel Sentences , 1973 .
[16] M. Braine,et al. Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences , 1974 .
[17] I. M. Schlesinger,et al. WHY A SENTENCE IN WHICH A SENTENCE IN WHICH A SENTENCE IS EMBEDDED IS EMBEDDED IS DIFFICULT , 1975 .
[18] J. S. Evans,et al. Understanding sentences with relative clauses , 1976, Memory & cognition.
[19] D Burns,et al. Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure , 1977, Memory & cognition.
[20] Mitchell P. Marcus,et al. A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .
[21] David Dillon,et al. Language learning , 2006, Language Teaching.
[22] Bryan J. Hubbell,et al. On memory limitations in natural language processing , 1982 .
[23] F P Roth,et al. Accelerating language learning in young children , 1984, Journal of Child Language.
[24] Stuart M. Shieber,et al. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language , 1985 .
[25] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch , 1986 .
[26] S Dickinson. Recursion in Development: Support for a Biological Model of Language , 1987, Language and speech.
[27] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Processing crossed and nested dependencies: An automation perspective on the psycholinguistic results , 1990 .
[28] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing , 1990 .
[29] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[30] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure , 1991, Mach. Learn..
[31] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[32] Michael L. Hoover,et al. Sentence processing strategies in Spanish and English , 1992 .
[33] J. Elman. Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.
[34] Robert F. Hadley. Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning , 1994 .
[35] Morten H. Christiansen. Innite Languages, Finite Minds Connectionism, Learning and Linguistic Structure , 1994 .
[36] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Generalization and connectionist language learning , 1994 .
[37] John A. Hawkins,et al. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .
[38] Michael A. Arbib,et al. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.
[39] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .
[40] Dianne Bradley,et al. The Effect of -ga Sequences on Processing Japanese Multiply Center-Embedded Sentences , 1996, PACLIC.
[41] Paul Hagstrom,et al. Differences Between Korean and Japanese Processing Overload , 1997 .
[42] Julie E. Boland. The Relationship Between Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Sentence Comprehension. , 1997 .
[43] E. Dąbrowska. The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists , 1997 .
[44] G. Marcus. Rethinking Eliminative Connectionism , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[46] J. Zwart. The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.
[47] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .
[48] Nick Chater,et al. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[49] Mark Steedman,et al. The nite connectivity of linguistic structure , 1999 .
[50] E. Gibson,et al. Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical , 1999 .
[51] David C. Plaut,et al. A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[52] Wilhelm Freiherr von Humboldt,et al. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species , 2001 .
[53] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Integrating Distributional, Prosodic and Phonological Information in a Connectionist Model of Language Acquisition , 2001 .
[54] David C. Plaut,et al. A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production , 2002 .
[55] Noam Chomsky,et al. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .
[56] Noam Chomsky,et al. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.
[57] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .
[58] Nick Chater,et al. Constituency and recursion in language , 2003 .
[59] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Phonological and Distributional Cues in Syntax Acquisition: Scaling up the Connectionist Approach to Multiple-Cue Integration - eScholarship , 2003 .
[60] James L. McClelland,et al. Graded state machines: The representation of temporal contingencies in simple recurrent networks , 1991, Machine Learning.
[61] D. Plaut,et al. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. , 2004, Psychological review.
[62] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[63] James L. McClelland,et al. Graded State Machines: The Representation of Temporal Contingencies in Simple Recurrent Networks , 2005, Machine Learning.
[64] Matthew M Botvinick,et al. Short-term memory for serial order: a recurrent neural network model. , 2006, Psychological review.
[65] Alaa A. Kharbouch,et al. Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[66] Cedric Boeckx,et al. Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims , 2006 .
[67] Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al. The faculty of language , 2007 .
[68] Fred Karlsson,et al. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses , 2007 .
[69] Kara D. Federmeier. Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[70] M. Pickering,et al. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[71] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[72] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[73] Y. Niv,et al. Dialogues on prediction errors , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[74] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Large-Scale Modeling of Wordform Learning and Representation , 2008, Cogn. Sci..
[75] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[76] Simon Kirby,et al. Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax , 2009 .
[77] Peter Hagoort,et al. Reflections on the neurobiology of syntax , 2009 .
[78] Scott P. Johnson. Neoconstructivism: The New Science of Cognitive Development , 2009 .
[79] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Connectionist Explorations of Multiple-Cue Integration in Syntax Acquisition , 2009 .
[80] Shravan Vasishth,et al. Processing grammatical and ungrammatical center embeddings in English and German: A computational model , 2009 .
[81] S. Levinson,et al. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.