Overview Of The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Database

Abstract Objective: An evaluation of the history, design, and status of the database of the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC) was undertaken to identify its continued relevance. Research Design: A systematic review was conducted of goals, content, and quality control procedures, as well as its suitability and public availability for conducting future epidemiologic and health services research. Results: The NSCISC database contains information on approximately 29,000 persons injured since 1973 and treated at any regional model spinal cord injury system within 1year of injury. The NSCISC database is structured longitudinally with data collected at discharge, 1year after injury, 5 years after injury, and every 5 years thereafter. The database includes information on demographics, injury seventy, medical complications, surgical procedures, types and amounts of therapy, length of stay, charges, and both short-term and long-term treatment outcomes. Strengths include large sample size, use of valid and reliable measures, geographic and patient diversity, comprehensiveness, availability of long-term prospective follow-up information, good case identification, and rigorous quality control procedures. Limitations include lack of population basis, inclusion of only model system patients, losses to follow-up, and other missing data. Recent content additions include detailed information on each treatment phase, depression, substance abuse, environmental barriers to community integration, and patient identifying information. A process exists for researchers to gain access to the data. Conclusions: The database remains a valuable resource. Future plans include linkage to other databases to enhance research capability, a published research compendium, and development of a users guide to facilitate database usage.

[1]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  E. Roth,et al.  Functional outcome following spinal cord injury. A comparison of specialized spinal cord injury center vs general hospital short-term care. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[3]  M. Devivo,et al.  Benefits of early admission to an organised spinal cord injury care system , 1990, Paraplegia.

[4]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[5]  M. Dijkers,et al.  The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): Metric Properties and Scoring , 1998 .

[6]  C. Granger,et al.  UDS report. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990. , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  R. Spitzer,et al.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. , 1999, JAMA.

[8]  J. Kurtzke,et al.  Epidemiology of spinal cord injury , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  S L Stover,et al.  History, implementation, and current status of the National Spinal Cord Injury Database. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  A. Nobunaga,et al.  Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  C. Wilmot,et al.  Benefits of early admission to a comprehensive trauma center for patients with spinal cord injury. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.