Integrated Next-Generation Sequencing and Avatar Mouse Models for Personalized Cancer Treatment

Background: Current technology permits an unbiased massive analysis of somatic genetic alterations from tumor DNA as well as the generation of individualized mouse xenografts (Avatar models). This work aimed to evaluate our experience integrating these two strategies to personalize the treatment of patients with cancer. Methods: We performed whole-exome sequencing analysis of 25 patients with advanced solid tumors to identify putatively actionable tumor-specific genomic alterations. Avatar models were used as an in vivo platform to test proposed treatment strategies. Results: Successful exome sequencing analyses have been obtained for 23 patients. Tumor-specific mutations and copy-number variations were identified. All samples profiled contained relevant genomic alterations. Tumor was implanted to create an Avatar model from 14 patients and 10 succeeded. Occasionally, actionable alterations such as mutations in NF1, PI3KA, and DDR2 failed to provide any benefit when a targeted drug was tested in the Avatar and, accordingly, treatment of the patients with these drugs was not effective. To date, 13 patients have received a personalized treatment and 6 achieved durable partial remissions. Prior testing of candidate treatments in Avatar models correlated with clinical response and helped to select empirical treatments in some patients with no actionable mutations. Conclusion: The use of full genomic analysis for cancer care is encouraging but presents important challenges that will need to be solved for broad clinical application. Avatar models are a promising investigational platform for therapeutic decision making. While limitations still exist, this strategy should be further tested. Clin Cancer Res; 20(9); 2476–84. ©2014 AACR.

[1]  T. MacDonald,et al.  A feasibility and efficacy study of rapamycin and erlotinib for recurrent pediatric low‐grade glioma (LGG) , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[2]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  Prognostic Significance of AKT/mTOR and MAPK Pathways and Antitumor Effect of mTOR Inhibitor in NF1-Related and Sporadic Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  S. Kopetz,et al.  The Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts: The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  A. Valencia,et al.  Getting personalized cancer genome analysis into the clinic: the challenges in bioinformatics , 2012, Genome Medicine.

[5]  Michael R. Hayden,et al.  Whole-Genome Sequencing: The New Standard of Care? , 2012, Science.

[6]  Shengyue Wang,et al.  Exploring the cancer genome in the era of next-generation sequencing , 2012, Frontiers of Medicine.

[7]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Baker Functional genomics: The changes that count , 2012, Nature.

[9]  T. Hudson,et al.  The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment Decisions , 2012, Cell.

[10]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Prioritizing phase I treatment options through preclinical testing on personalized tumorgraft. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  David R Parkinson,et al.  Making Personalized Cancer Medicine a Reality: Challenges and Opportunities in the Development of Biomarkers and Companion Diagnostics , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  C. Corless Personalized Cancer Diagnostics , 2011, Science.

[13]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  A Pilot Clinical Study of Treatment Guided by Personalized Tumorgrafts in Patients with Advanced Cancer , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[14]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Mutations in the DDR2 kinase gene identify a novel therapeutic target in squamous cell lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[15]  M. Stratton Exploring the Genomes of Cancer Cells: Progress and Promise , 2011, Science.

[16]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[17]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  KRAS mutation analysis: a comparison between primary tumours and matched liver metastases in 305 colorectal cancer patients , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  L. Garraway,et al.  Clinical implications of the cancer genome. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Personalizing Cancer Treatment in the Age of Global Genomic Analyses: PALB2 Gene Mutations and the Response to DNA Damaging Agents in Pancreatic Cancer , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[20]  Michael Bittner,et al.  Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  L. Ellis,et al.  Finding the tumor copycat: Therapy fails, patients don't , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[22]  J. Salk Clonal evolution in cancer , 2010 .

[23]  M. Fujii,et al.  G-protein γ subunit GNG11 strongly regulates cellular senescence , 2006 .

[24]  R. Hruban,et al.  An In vivo Platform for Translational Drug Development in Pancreatic Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  M. Fujii,et al.  G-protein gamma subunit GNG11 strongly regulates cellular senescence. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.