Factorial representations to generate arbitrary search distributions

A powerful approach to search is to try to learn a distribution of good solutions (in particular of the dependencies between their variables) and use this distribution as a basis to sample new search points. Existing algorithms learn the search distribution directly on the given problem representation. We ask how search distributions can be modeled indirectly by a proper choice of factorial genetic code. For instance, instead of learning a direct probabilistic model of the dependencies between variables (like BOA does), one can alternatively learn a genetic representation of solutions on which these dependencies vanish. We consider questions like: Can every distribution be induced indirectly by a proper factorial representation? How can such representations be constructed from data? Are specific generative representations, like grammars or L-systems, universal w.r.t. inducing arbitrary distributions? We will consider latent variable probabilistic models as a framework to address such questions and thereby also establish relations to machine learning concepts like ICA.

[1]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  A Method for Integrating Genetic Search Based Function Optimization and Competitive Learning , 1994 .

[2]  Dirk Thierens,et al.  On the complexity of hierarchical problem solving , 2005, GECCO '05.

[3]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A Survey of Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models , 2002, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[4]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  Compact Genetic Codes as a Search Strategy of Evolutionary Processes , 2005, FOGA.

[5]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  On the Evolution of Phenotypic Exploration Distributions , 2002, FOGA.

[6]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  The Structure of Evolutionary Exploration: On Crossover, Buildings Blocks, and Estimation-Of-Distribution Algorithms , 2002, GECCO.

[7]  Priati,et al.  Probabilistic Grammars and Their Applications , .

[8]  Gregory S. Hornby,et al.  The advantages of generative grammatical encodings for physical design , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[9]  Gregory S. Hornby,et al.  Generative representations for evolutionary design automation , 2003 .

[10]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Lindenmayer Systems, Fractals, and Plants , 1989, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics.

[11]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  Demonstrating the Evolution of Complex Genetic Representations: An Evolution of Artificial Plants , 2003, GECCO.

[12]  S. Baluja,et al.  Using Optimal Dependency-Trees for Combinatorial Optimization: Learning the Structure of the Search Space , 1997 .

[13]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  Using Optimal Dependency-Trees for Combinational Optimization , 1997, ICML.

[14]  J. Pollack,et al.  A computational model of symbiotic composition in evolutionary transitions. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[15]  Edwin D. de Jong,et al.  Representation Development from Pareto-Coevolution , 2003, GECCO.

[16]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Evolving L-systems to generate virtual creatures , 2001, Comput. Graph..