The Value-Driven Meaning of Grades

A multiple case study approach was used to investigate how grades were assigned by teachers and used by students and parents. This study reported that the interpretation and use of a grade is driven by the value students, parents, and teachers attach to grades. Because high grades were valued, students faced negative consequences for low grades. Parents and teachers, therefore, used grades to control student performance of those students who also valued high grades. Students who did not value grades were controlled by other outside factors they valued. Parents and teachers used both reward and coercive power to control expected student outcomes. This exertion of power resulted in students not valuing the learning process. Instead, they were motivated to perform to receive an extrinsic reward or a high grade and to avoid punishments from things they valued.

[1]  S. Brookhart Grading Practices and Validity , 1991 .

[2]  J. Terwilliger Classroom Standard Setting and Grading Practices , 1989 .

[3]  James S. Terwilliger Assigning grades to students , 1971 .

[4]  M. Deutsch Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems. , 1979 .

[5]  N. E. Gronlund Measurement and evaluation in teaching , 1965 .

[6]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[7]  Philip A. Griswold,et al.  Inside High School Grading Practices: Building a Research Agenda , 1989 .

[8]  Albert C. Oosterhof Classroom applications of educational measurement , 1994 .

[9]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[10]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[11]  Susan M. Brookhart,et al.  Teachers' Grading Practices: Meaning and Values. , 1993 .

[12]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Essentials of educational measurement , 1972 .

[13]  J. Michaels Classroom Reward Structures and Academic Performance , 1977 .

[14]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Compliance‐resistance in the college classroom , 1989 .

[15]  S. Messick Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment , 1989 .

[16]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Effects of competitive reward structure and valence of outcome on children's achievement attributions. , 1977 .

[17]  John M. Keller,et al.  Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective , 1979 .