Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of Us and European Patents
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dietmar Harhoff,et al. Post Grant Review Systems at the U.S. Patent Office – Design Parameters and Expected Impact , 2004 .
[2] David C. Mowery,et al. Post-Issue Patent , 2002 .
[3] David C. Mowery,et al. Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition , 2003, Innovation Policy and the Economy.
[4] Z. Griliches,et al. Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .
[5] Christine Jolls,et al. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics , 1998 .
[6] Mark A. Schankerman,et al. Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .
[7] Mark A. Lemley,et al. Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .
[8] B. Lundvall. National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .
[9] Josh Lerner,et al. The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 1997 .
[10] Deepak Somaya. Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation , 2003 .
[11] Laura S. Hjerpe,et al. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , 2003 .
[12] Stephen A Merrill,et al. Patents in the knowledge-based economy , 2003 .
[13] Robert P. Merges,et al. As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform , 1999 .
[14] Michael J. Meurer,et al. The Settlement of Patent Litigation , 1989 .
[15] Stuart J. H. Graham,et al. Submarines in software? continuations in US software patenting in the 1980s and 1990s , 2004 .
[16] C. Shapiro,et al. Optimal Patent Length and Breadth , 1990 .
[17] John H. Barton,et al. Reforming the Patent System , 2000, Science.
[18] Mark A. Lemley,et al. Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents , 1998 .
[19] Alfons Palangkaraya,et al. Patent Application Outcomes Across the Trilateral Patent Offices , 2005 .
[20] Junzo Ishii,et al. Competition, Innovation and Racing for Priority at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , 2005 .
[21] D. Harhoff,et al. Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .
[22] David C. Mowery,et al. Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of Us Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions , 2002 .
[23] Mark A. Lemley,et al. Valuable Patents , 2003 .
[24] D. H. Besterfield. Quality control , 1979 .
[25] Thomas C. Melvin,et al. European Patent Office , 2002 .
[26] R. Levin,et al. A patent system for the 21st Century , 2005 .
[27] Jonathan Levin,et al. Patent Oppositions∗ , 2002 .
[28] Robert P. Merges,et al. Incentives to Challenge and Defend Patents: Why Litigation Won't Reliably Fix Patent Office Errors and Why Administrative Patent Review Might Help , 2004 .
[29] Christian A. Chu. Empirical Analysis of the Federal Circuit's Claim Construction Trends , 2001 .