Paraconsistency and Plausible Argumentation in Generative Grammar: A Case Study

While the analytical philosophy of science regards inconsistent theories as disastrous, Chomsky allows for the temporary tolerance of inconsistency between the hypotheses and the data. However, in linguistics there seem to be several types of inconsistency. The present paper aims at the development of a novel metatheoretical framework which provides tools for the representation and evaluation of inconsistencies in linguistic theories. The metatheoretical model relies on a system of paraconsistent logic and distinguishes between strong and weak inconsistency. Strong inconsistency is destructive in that it leads to logical chaos. In contrast, weak inconsistency may be constructive, because it is capable of accounting for the simultaneous presence of seemingly incompatible structures. However, paraconsistent logic cannot grasp the dynamism of the emergence and resolution of weak inconsistencies. Therefore, the metatheoretical approach is extended to plausible argumentation. The workability of this metatheoretical model is tested with the help of a detailed case study on an analysis of discontinuous constituents in Government-Binding Theory.

[1]  Edith A. Moravcsik Conflict resolution in syntactic theory , 2010 .

[2]  Edith A. Moravcsik An Introduction to Syntactic Theory , 2006 .

[3]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .

[4]  Mamede Lima-Marques,et al.  Contextual Negations and Reasoning with Contradictions , 1991, IJCAI.

[5]  L. R. Harris Hypothetical reasoning , 1989 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Nature and Language , 2002 .

[7]  Carson T. Schütze The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[8]  G. M. Horn,et al.  On ‘On binding’ , 1981 .

[9]  Benji Wald,et al.  The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology By Carson T. Schütze (review) , 2015 .

[10]  S. Jaskowski Propositional calculus for contradictory deductive systems , 1969 .

[11]  Jonathan White Result clauses and the structure of degree phrases , 1997 .

[12]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[13]  C. W. Tate Solve it. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[14]  Carson T. Schütze The empirical base of linguistics , 2016 .

[15]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[16]  Csilla Rákosi,et al.  Cyclic vs. circular argumentation in the Conceptual Metaphor Theory , 2009 .

[17]  Diderik Batens,et al.  A Universal Logic Approach to Adaptive Logics , 2007, Logica Universalis.

[18]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Plausible reasoning , 1976 .

[19]  Francesco Paoli,et al.  Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications , 2013, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.

[20]  R. May,et al.  Extraposition and logical form , 1984 .

[21]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Paraconsistent logics , 1998 .

[22]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  A coherence theory of truth , 2005 .

[23]  W. Carnielli,et al.  Logics of Formal Inconsistency , 2007 .

[24]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  On the theory of inconsistent formal systems , 1974, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[25]  G. Priest Inconsistency and the Empirical Sciences , 2002 .

[26]  A. Kertész,et al.  Inconsistency and plausible reasoning in an analysis of German affricates: A case study in the philosophy of linguistics , 2006 .

[27]  J. Meheus Inconsistency in science , 2002 .

[28]  N. Rescher,et al.  The coherence theory of truth , 1973 .

[29]  A. Kertész The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorising , 2012 .

[30]  G. Pólya Patterns of plausible inference , 1970 .

[31]  Sam Featherston Relax, lean back, and be a linguist , 2009 .

[32]  Yukio Oba,et al.  ON THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION , 1993 .

[33]  D. Batens A General Characterization of Adaptive Logics , 2001 .

[34]  Ray E. Jennings,et al.  Inference and necessity , 1980, Journal of Philosophical Logic.

[35]  Thomas Nickles,et al.  From Copernicus to Ptolemy: Inconsistency and Method , 2002 .

[36]  David Ripley,et al.  Paraconsistent Logic , 2015, J. Philos. Log..

[37]  B. T. King,et al.  Preface , 2012 .

[38]  A. Kertész,et al.  Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model , 2012 .

[39]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  The logic of inconsistency , 1979 .

[40]  G. Priest Paraconsistent Belief Revision , 2008 .

[41]  U. Meixner The Law of Non-Contradiction , 1997 .