3D isotropic turbo spin-echo intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control in knee imaging: comparison study with 3D isotropic fast-field echo sequence

Background Three-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE) images have been used in imaging of the extremities and comparable diagnostic performance to two-dimensional (2D) TSE images has been reported in several studies. However, comparison of the 3D isotropic TSE intermediate-weighted sequence and 3D FFE sequence in terms of image quality has not been investigated. Purpose To compare the image quality of a 3D isotropic TSE intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control (volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition [VISTA]) and a 3D isotropic fast-field echo (FFE) sequence of the knee joint. Material and Methods 3.0 T knee MRI with VISTA and 3D FFE sequences was performed in 10 healthy volunteers (3 men, 7 women; age range 26–30 years). Two radiologists with specialties in the musculoskeletal system assessed tissue contrast between the fluid-cruciate ligament (F-L), fluid-meniscus (F-M), and fluid-cartilage (F-C) based on a 4-point scale (1, poor; 2, fair; 3, good; and 4, excellent). Statistical analysis for inter-observer agreement and differences in grades in tissue contrast between VISTA and 3D FFE images (Wilcoxon signed-rank) were performed. For a quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was obtained by imaging phantom and noise-only image. Image contrast ratios (CRs) were calculated between F-L, F-M, and F-C in volunteer images of VISTA and 3D FFE and compared statistically with a paired t-test. Results Based on qualitative analysis, VISTA had statistically superior grades of tissue contrast in F-L (P < 0.001) and F-M (P < 0.001). 3D FFE had superior but not statistically significant (P = 0.317) grades in F-C. Based on quantitative analysis, the SNR of the phantom imaging was higher in VISTA than that in 3D FFE (28.18 vs. 14.90). VISTA had superior CRs in F-L (P < 0.001) and F-M (P < 0.001). 3D FFE had superior CR in F-C (P = 0.038). Conclusion The VISTA sequence was superior in tissue contrast between F-M and F-L, and 3D FFE was superior in tissue contrast between F-C, subjectively and quantitatively.

[1]  R. König,et al.  Dual-source parallel RF transmission for clinical MR imaging of the spine at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison with conventional single-source transmission. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Parallel spectroscopic imaging with spin‐echo trains , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  S. Totterman,et al.  Lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: MR findings with a three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo sequence. , 1996, Radiology.

[4]  D M Kramer,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and section thickness in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[5]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  H. Bruhn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2‐weighted fast spin echo, T1‐weighted two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[7]  C. Stehling,et al.  Isotropic 3-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Imaging Versus Standard 2-Dimensional Imaging at 3.0 T of the Knee: Artificial Cartilage and Meniscal Lesions in a Porcine Model , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  MRI of the knee ligaments and menisci: comparison of isotropic-resolution 3D and conventional 2D fast spin-echo sequences at 3 T. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  J. Reeder,et al.  MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J H Mink,et al.  Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. , 1988, Radiology.

[11]  C. Kang,et al.  Evaluation of the Chondromalacia Patella Using a Microscopy Coil: Comparison of the Two-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Techniques and the Three-Dimensional Fast Field Echo Techniques , 2011, Korean journal of radiology.

[12]  Philip J Beatty,et al.  Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Christopher F. Beaulieu,et al.  Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube--initial experience in healthy volunteers. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Johannes T Heverhagen,et al.  Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  Andreas Mohr,et al.  The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[16]  D G Disler,et al.  Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  A A Bankier,et al.  Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  K. Friedrich,et al.  High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[19]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  D. Thomasson,et al.  Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo with proton-density-like contrast: a comprehensive approach to musculoskeletal MRI. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Evaluation of the menisci of the knee joint using three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo imaging: diagnostic performance in 250 patients with surgical correlation , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[22]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. , 2009, Radiology.

[23]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[25]  G. Jundt,et al.  Spin-echo and 3D gradient-echo imaging of the knee joint: a clinical and histopathological comparison. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Jin Hwan Ahn,et al.  Diagnosis of internal derangement of the knee at 3.0-T MR imaging: 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted versus 2D sequences. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  B. Kladny,et al.  MRI of the knee joint with a 3-D gradient echo sequence , 1992, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[28]  J. Lee,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests. , 1988, Radiology.

[29]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[30]  C. Heron,et al.  Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. , 1992, Radiology.