Pathways to Enhance Multilevel Learning for Scaling Up Systemic ICT-Enabled Learning Innovations: Lessons from 7 European and Asian Cases

This chapter presents a meta-study of the implementation strategies of seven cases of ICT-enabled learning innovations (ICT-ELIs), with a particular focus on lessons learnt about their sustainability, scalability and systemic impact. Three of the cases come from Europe (eTwinning, 1:1 Learning and Hellerup School) and four from Asian countries (e-Learning Pilot Scheme in Hong Kong SAR, Knowledge Construction with Technology (CoREF) in Japan, Third Masterplan for ICT in Education (mp3) in Singapore and Digital Textbook project in South Korea). Almost all the analysed cases have either been developed over a period of more than 10 years or have built on system-level initiatives that started years ago. The cases were analysed in terms of the context, scale and nature of the innovation, the intended learning outcomes, the role of technology and the leadership strategies. The synthesis of the case study findings reveals that the core dimensions of an innovation for learning—nature of the innovation, phase of implementation, access level, targeted stakeholders and impact area—interact and are interdependent. The contexts of the innovations are complex, and the starting points and pathways of change and scalability observed are extremely diverse. The observed characteristics are aligned with an ecological model of change and innovation rather than classical models where scaling up would involve the propagation of well-tested prototypes or solutions. Each of the seven ICT-ELIs is a dynamic system comprising hierarchically nested levels of actors and contextual factors, which interact and are hence interdependent. Analysis of the seven cases’ learning outcomes—seen as changes that have taken place over time at individual, school, project and system levels—reveals that alignment of learning across these different levels is critical to the impact and scalability of ICT-ELIs and that this alignment requires the design and implementation of appropriate structures and mechanisms to scaffold learning through horizontal and vertical interactions within and across levels. This model has important implications for policies and strategies for the further development and progressive mainstreaming of ICT-ELIs.

[1]  Nancy Law Educational innovations beyond technology: nurturing leadership and establishing learning organizations / Nancy Law, Allan Yuen, Robert Fox , 2011 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[3]  B. Levin,et al.  How to Change 5000 Schools: A Practical and Positive Approach for Leading Change at Every Level , 2008 .

[4]  Nancy Law,et al.  ICT-enabled innovation for learning in Europe and Asia. Exploring conditions for sustainability, scalability and impact at system level , 2013 .

[5]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[6]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[7]  Stanislav Y. Ranguelov,et al.  Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011. , 2011 .

[8]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  Mapping and Analysing Prospective Technologies for Learning - Results from a Consultation with European Stakeholders and Roadmaps for Policy Action , 2014 .

[9]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Business , 2011 .

[10]  Punie Yves,et al.  Innovating teaching and learning practices: Key elements for developing Creative Classrooms in Europe , 2012 .

[11]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Constancy and Change in Work Practice in Schools: The Role of Organizational Routines , 2011 .

[12]  A. Collins,et al.  Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Technology, Education--Connections (TEC) Series. , 2009 .

[13]  Brian Holmes,et al.  School Teachers' Continuous Professional Development in an Online Learning Community: lessons from a case study of an eTwinning Learning Event , 2013 .

[14]  Jody Clarke,et al.  Design for Scalability: A Case Study of the River City Curriculum , 2009 .

[15]  A. Hargreaves Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity , 2003 .

[16]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis , 2001 .

[17]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Architectures for Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Two Urban School Districts , 2008, American Journal of Education.

[18]  Niki Davis,et al.  How May Teacher Learning Be Promoted for Educational Renewal with IT , 2008 .

[19]  Yves Punie,et al.  Towards a Mapping Framework of ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning , 2012 .

[20]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[21]  Dennis Sumara,et al.  Complexity as a theory of education , 2009 .

[22]  J. Voogt,et al.  International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education , 2008 .