Interfacing Building Response with Human Behavior Under Seismic Events

The goal of this paper is to model the interaction of humans with their built environment during and immediately following a natural disaster. The study uses finite element simulations to evaluate the response of buildings under input ground motions and agent-based dynamic modeling to model the subsequent evacuation of building occupants in the study area immediately following the seismic event. The structural model directly captures building damage and collapse, as well as floor accelerations and displacements to determine nonstructural damage, injuries and fatalities. The goal of this research is to make connections between building damage and occupant injuries, with geographic automata as the information handler for the agent-based platform. This research demonstrates that human behavior and evacuation patterns can be evaluated in the context of realistic structural and nonstructural damage assessments, and that prior knowledge of evacuation patterns is critical for adequate preparedness of cities to severe earthquakes.

[1]  Timo Korhonen,et al.  Evacuation experiments in offices and public buildings , 2007 .

[2]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[3]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Testing and Analysis of Steel and Concrete Beam-Column Assemblies under a Column Removal Scenario , 2011 .

[4]  B. Aguirre,et al.  Contributions of social science to agent-based models of building evacuation , 2011 .

[5]  N. Badler,et al.  Crowd simulation incorporating agent psychological models, roles and communication , 2005 .

[6]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Macromodel-Based Simulation of Progressive Collapse: Steel Frame Structures , 2008 .

[7]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Behavior of Ductile SMRFs at Various Seismic Hazard Levels , 2000 .

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  J. Kerridge,et al.  Human Movement Behaviour in Urban Spaces: Implications for the Design and Modelling of Effective Pedestrian Environments , 2004 .

[10]  Steven L. Lytinen,et al.  Agent-based Simulation Platforms: Review and Development Recommendations , 2006, Simul..

[11]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Continuum crowds , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[12]  T. Nagatani,et al.  Jamming transition in pedestrian counter flow , 1999 .

[13]  A. Schadschneider,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two dimensional cellular automaton , 2001 .

[14]  Vicsek,et al.  Freezing by heating in a driven mesoscopic system , 1999, Physical review letters.

[15]  Nicolas Marmaras,et al.  Searching efficient plans for emergency rescue through simulation: the case of a metro fire , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  H. Kelley,et al.  Collective behavior in a simulated panic situation , 1965 .

[17]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation , 2001 .

[18]  Taras I. Lakoba,et al.  Modifications of the Helbing-Molnár-Farkas-Vicsek Social Force Model for Pedestrian Evolution , 2005, Simul..

[19]  L. F. Henderson,et al.  The Statistics of Crowd Fluids , 1971, Nature.