Measuring the Cobb angle with the iPhone in kyphoses: a reliability study

PurposeSmartphones have gained widespread use in the healthcare field to fulfill a variety of tasks. We developed a small iPhone application to take advantage of the built-in position sensor to measure angles in a variety of spinal deformities. We present a reliability study of this tool in measuring kyphotic angles.MethodsRadiographs taken from 20 different patients' charts were presented to a panel of six operators at two different times. Radiographs were measured with the protractor and the iPhone application and statistical analysis was applied to measure intraclass correlation coefficients between both measurement methods, and to measure intra- and interobserver reliabilityResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient calculated between methods (i.e. CobbMeter application on the iPhone versus standard method with the protractor) was 0.963 for all measures, indicating excellent correlation was obtained between the CobbMeter application and the standard method. The interobserver correlation coefficient was 0.965. The intraobserver ICC was 0.977, indicating excellent reproductibility of measurements at different times for all operators. The interobserver ICC between fellowship trained senior surgeons and general orthopaedic residents was 0.989. Consistently, the ICC for intraobserver and interobserver correlations was higher with the CobbMeter application than with the regular protractor method. This difference was not statistically significant.ConclusionMeasuring kyphotic angles with the iPhone application appears to be a valid procedure and is in no way inferior to the standard way of measuring the Cobb angle in kyphotic deformities.

[1]  Leilei Xu,et al.  Reliability Analysis of a Smartphone-aided Measurement Method for the Cobb Angle of Scoliosis , 2012, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  Mobile computing platforms such as the iPhone are beginning to make inroads into the laboratory-serious prospect or fairy tale? , 2010, Nature methods.

[3]  Allan Donner,et al.  Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results , 2004 .

[4]  Michael G. Fehlings,et al.  Radiographic Measurement Parameters in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group , 2006, Spine.

[5]  C. Fisher,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilty of measures of kyphosis in thoracolumbar fractures. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Michael D Colvard,et al.  Handheld directed energy sensor for environmental monitoring and clinician safety. , 2010, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .

[8]  Elizabeth Ciemins,et al.  An Analysis of Data Management Tools for Diabetes Self-Management: Can Smart Phone Technology Keep Up? , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[9]  Jean-Paul Chilès,et al.  Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics , 2012 .

[10]  M M Shoukri,et al.  Issues of Cost and Efficiency in the Design of Reliability Studies , 2003, Biometrics.

[11]  Progress in orthopedic surgery for 1945; conditions involving the spine and thorax, exclusive of those in the lower part of the back. , 1947, Archives of surgery.

[12]  Clayton J. Adam,et al.  Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[13]  J. Cobb The problem of the primary curve. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[15]  A. Badke,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[16]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[17]  Asim F. Choudhri,et al.  Initial Experience with a Handheld Device Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Viewer: OsiriX Mobile on the iPhone , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[18]  Kate Huvane Gamble,et al.  Wireless Tech Trends 2010. Trend: smartphones. , 2010, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[19]  Alan P Pinheiro,et al.  Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  P. Gikas,et al.  Smartphones in orthopaedics , 2012, International Orthopaedics.