Exploitation of an ancestral pheromone biosynthetic pathway contributes to diversification in Heliconius butterflies

During courtship, male butterflies of many species produce androconial secretions containing male sex pheromones (MSPs) that communicate species identity and affect female choice. MSPs are thus likely candidates as reproductive barriers, yet their role in speciation remains poorly studied. Although Heliconius butterflies are a model system in speciation, their MSPs have not been investigated from a macroevolutionary perspective. We use GC/MS to characterize male androconial secretions in 33 of the 69 species in the Heliconiini tribe. We found these blends to be species-specific, consistent with a role in reproductive isolation. We detected a burst in blend diversification rate at the most speciose genus, Heliconius; a consequence of Heliconius and Eueides species using a fatty acid (FA) metabolic pathway to unlock more complex blends than basal Heliconiini species, whose secretions are dominated by plant-like metabolites. A comparison of 10 sister species pairs demonstrates a striking positive correlation between blend dissimilarity and range overlap, consistent with character displacement or reinforcement in sympatry. These results demonstrate for the first time that MSP diversification can promote reproductive isolation across this group of butterflies, showcasing how implementation of an ancestral trait, the co-option of the FA metabolic pathway for pheromone production, can facilitate rapid speciation.

[1]  S. Montgomery,et al.  Pollen feeding in Heliconius butterflies: the singular evolution of an adaptive suite , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[2]  P. Rastas,et al.  A novel terpene synthase produces an anti-aphrodisiac pheromone in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene , 2019 .

[3]  J. Mallet,et al.  Geographic contrasts between pre‐ and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies , 2019, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  P. Rastas,et al.  A major locus controls a biologically active pheromone component in Heliconius melpomene , 2019, bioRxiv.

[5]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  Chemical convergence between plants and insects: biosynthetic origins and functions of common secondary metabolites. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[6]  K. M. Kozak,et al.  Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range , 2019, bioRxiv.

[7]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Male pheromone composition depends on larval but not adult diet in Heliconius melpomene , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Decoupled diversification dynamics of feeding morphology following a major functional innovation in marine butterflyfishes , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  K. Dasmahapatra,et al.  The Scent Chemistry of Heliconius Wing Androconia , 2017, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[10]  Chengzhe Li,et al.  Role of visual and olfactory cues in sex recognition in butterfly Cethosia cyane cyane , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Male sex pheromone components in Heliconius butterflies released by the androconia affect female choice , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Phylogenetic comparative methods , 2017, Current Biology.

[13]  C. Salazar,et al.  What shapes the continuum of reproductive isolation? Lessons from Heliconius butterflies , 2017, bioRxiv.

[14]  T. Eltz,et al.  Macroevolution of perfume signalling in orchid bees. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[15]  G. Merceron,et al.  mvmorph: an r package for fitting multivariate evolutionary models to morphometric data , 2015 .

[16]  M. Joron,et al.  Beyond magic traits: Multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Simon H. Martin,et al.  The diversification of Heliconius butterflies: what have we learned in 150 years? , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  J. Yew,et al.  Insect pheromones: An overview of function, form, and discovery. , 2015, Progress in lipid research.

[19]  A. Phillimore,et al.  Extensive range overlap between heliconiine sister species: evidence for sympatric speciation in butterflies? , 2015, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  C. E. Allen,et al.  Selection on male sex pheromone composition contributes to butterfly reproductive isolation , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  D. Adams A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. , 2014, Systematic biology.

[22]  Jean-Marc Lassance,et al.  Sex pheromone biosynthetic pathways are conserved between moths and the butterfly Bicyclus anynana , 2014, Nature Communications.

[23]  James Mallet,et al.  Multilocus Species Trees Show the Recent Adaptive Radiation of the Mimetic Heliconius Butterflies , 2014, bioRxiv.

[24]  N. Nadeau,et al.  Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[25]  Simon H. Martin,et al.  Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies , 2013, Genome research.

[26]  D. Adams,et al.  geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data , 2013 .

[27]  Patricio A. Salazar,et al.  Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  J. Mallet,et al.  Hybrid zones and the speciation continuum in Heliconius butterflies , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[29]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Adaptive Introgression across Species Boundaries in Heliconius Butterflies , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[30]  Sharlene E. Santana,et al.  Morphological innovation, diversification and invasion of a new adaptive zone , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Simon H. Martin,et al.  Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species , 2012, Nature.

[32]  Gavin H. Thomas,et al.  MOTMOT: models of trait macroevolution on trees , 2012 .

[33]  W. Godsoe,et al.  Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[34]  E. Bermingham,et al.  Genetic Evidence for Hybrid Trait Speciation in Heliconius Butterflies , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[35]  D. Pfennig,et al.  Character Displacement: Ecological And Reproductive Responses To A Common Evolutionary Problem , 2009, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[36]  Tomas Johansson,et al.  Key biosynthetic gene subfamily recruited for pheromone production prior to the extensive radiation of Lepidoptera , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[37]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  L. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[39]  C. Jiggins Ecological Speciation in Mimetic Butterflies , 2008 .

[40]  M. Elgar,et al.  The evolution of pheromone diversity. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of butterflies of the tribe Acraeini (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) and the evolution of host plant use. , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[42]  Daniel I. Bolnick,et al.  Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence , 2007 .

[43]  T. Jones,et al.  The role of chemical communication in mate choice , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[44]  Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson,et al.  Male sex pheromone release and female mate choice in a butterfly , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[45]  M. Elgar,et al.  Species overlap, speciation and the evolution of aggregation pheromones in bark beetles , 2004 .

[46]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  P. Dixon VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology , 2003 .

[48]  M. Noor,et al.  The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data , 2003 .

[49]  A. Borg-Karlson,et al.  Antiaphrodisiacs in Pierid Butterflies: A Theme with Variation! , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[50]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Clade-specific morphological diversification and adaptive radiation in Hawaiian songbirds , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  J. Millar,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE PHEROMONE SYSTEM OF THE SATURNIID MOTHHEMILEUCA EGLANTERINA , 2001 .

[53]  James Mallet,et al.  Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[54]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[55]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Insect pheromones--an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. , 1999, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[56]  M. Ritchie,et al.  EVOLUTION OF COURTSHIP SONG AND REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN THE DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI SPECIES COMPLEX: DO SEXUAL SIGNALS DIVERGE THE MOST QUICKLY? , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  S. Heard,et al.  Key evolutionary innovations and their ecological mechanisms , 1995 .

[58]  L. Gilbert Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of heliconius butterflies. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  P. Karlson,et al.  ‘Pheromones’: a New Term for a Class of Biologically Active Substances , 1959, Nature.

[60]  K. Strøm The Ecological Niche , 1946, Nature.

[61]  H. Bates,et al.  XXXII. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. , 1862 .

[62]  J. Eisen,et al.  Character Displacement , 2018 .

[63]  R. Butlin,et al.  On the scent of speciation: the chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation , 2009, Heredity.

[64]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations , 2008, Bioinform..

[65]  L. Gilbert,et al.  An Antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene Butterflies , 2007, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[66]  T. Ando,et al.  Lepidopteran sex pheromones. , 2004, Topics in current chemistry.

[67]  M. Noor Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. , 1999, Heredity.

[68]  J. Hunter Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[69]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[70]  Clyde Arthur Morrison,et al.  Theory and Data , 1992 .

[71]  R. Cardé The Role of Pheromones in Reproductive Isolation and Speciation of Insects , 1986 .

[72]  K. S. Brown THE BIOLOGY OF HELICONIUS AND RELATED GENERA , 1981 .

[73]  F. Regnier,et al.  Insect pheromones. , 1968, Journal of lipid research.

[74]  M. Emsley A morphological study of imagine Heliconiinae (Lep.: Nymphalidae) with a consideration of the evolutionary relationships within the group , 1963, Zoologica : scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society..