Quantification of echo Chambers: a Methodological Framework considering Multi-Party Systems

The possibility of distributing user-generated content through online social networks (OSNs) has had liberating effects on society, with prominent examples such as the Arab Spring. Yet, since then, many dark sides of OSNs have been brought up. An example is the echo chambers phenomenon. Theory suggests that cognitive dissonance causes individuals to associate themselves with groups of like-minded individuals that are only exposed to content that confirms their previously held beliefs. In turn, deliberation amongst segregated groups increases social extremism and causes polarization, rather than moderation. Previous research endeavors to identify echo chambers in OSNs have scarcely investigated the community structures of a network on a fine granular level, specifically in the context of multi-party systems. To contribute to the scientific body of knowledge, we propose a framework that summarizes existing work and outlines a way for future research to fill this void. We further propose a new way to measure homophily in multi-party systems based on the cosine similarity between users. We evaluate our framework through real world data and find that members of the political right experience the least amount of crosscutting communication and the highest degrees of homophily.

[1]  Brian Dickinson,et al.  Sentiment Analysis of Investor Opinions on Twitter , 2015 .

[2]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[3]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[4]  Yanchi Liu,et al.  Community detection in graphs through correlation , 2014, KDD.

[5]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Outtweeting the Twitterers - Predicting Information Cascades in Microblogs , 2010, WOSN.

[6]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[7]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[8]  P. Bauer,et al.  Political Depolarization in German Public Opinion, 1980–2010* , 2013, Political Science Research and Methods.

[9]  F. Radicchi,et al.  Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  A. Gruzd Political polarization on social media: do birds of a feather flock together on Twitter? , 2015 .

[11]  R. Garrett Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[12]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[13]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Echo Chambers on Facebook , 2016 .

[14]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[15]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[16]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Quantifying Political Leaning from Tweets, Retweets, and Retweeters , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[17]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change , 2015 .

[18]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Quantifying Controversy on Social Media , 2018, ACM Trans. Soc. Comput..

[19]  Jutta Treviranus,et al.  The value of the unpopular: Counteracting the popularity echo-chamber on the Web , 2009, 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH).

[20]  Hiroki Takikawa,et al.  Political polarization in social media: Analysis of the “Twitter political field” in Japan , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[21]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Zhao Yang,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[23]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[24]  V A Traag,et al.  Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Soroush Vosoughi,et al.  Me, My Echo Chamber, and I: Introspection on Social Media Polarization , 2018, WWW.

[26]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[27]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[28]  Peter Dahlgren The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[29]  R. M. Alvarez Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data , 2014 .

[30]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[31]  Yarimar Bonilla,et al.  #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States , 2015 .

[32]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2014, MIS Q..

[33]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[34]  Brian G. Knight,et al.  Homophily, Group Size, and the Diffusion of Political Information in Social Networks: Evidence from Twitter , 2014 .

[35]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[36]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Jiye Baek,et al.  Network structure and patterns of information diversity on Twitter , 2016, MIS Q..

[38]  Andrea Lancichinetti,et al.  Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis: invited presentation, extended abstract , 2009, VALUETOOLS.

[39]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[41]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[42]  M. Jackson,et al.  An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation , 2007 .

[43]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of temporal variation in online media , 2011, WSDM '11.

[44]  Henner Gimpel,et al.  User Roles in Online Political Discussions: a Typology based on Twitter Data from the German Federal Election 2017 , 2018, ECIS.

[45]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Content Sharing in a Social Broadcasting Environment: Evidence from Twitter , 2014, MIS Q..

[46]  Matthew J. Lindberg,et al.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  K. Kaski,et al.  Limited resolution in complex network community detection with Potts model approach , 2006 .