A great place to work!?: Understanding crowdsourced employer branding

The benefits provided by employment and identified with a specific employing company are referred to as employer branding. We argue that when employees use IT to share and access work-related experiences openly across organizations, their expectations and assessments of workplaces change. We collected 38,000 reviews of the highest and lowest ranked employers on Glassdoor, an online crowdsourced employer branding platform. Using IBM Watson to analyze the data, we identify seven employer branding value propositions that current, former, and potential employees care about when they collectively evaluate employers. These propositions include (1) social elements of work, (2) interesting and challenging work tasks, (3) the extent to which skills can be applied in meaningful ways, (4) opportunities for professional development, (5) economic issues tied to compensation, (6) the role of management, and (7) work/life balance. We clarify that these value propositions do not all matter to the same extent and demonstrate how their relative valences and weights differ across organizations, especially if institutions are considered particularly good or bad places to work. Based on these findings, we show how employers can use crowdsourced employer branding intelligence to become great places to work that attract highly qualified employees.

[1]  P. Berthon,et al.  Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding , 2005 .

[2]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[3]  T. Ambler,et al.  The employer brand , 1996 .

[4]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[5]  Libby Sartain,et al.  Branding from the inside out at Yahoo!: HR's role as brand builder , 2005 .

[6]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Unpacking the Social Media Phenomenon: Towards a Research Agenda , 2012 .

[7]  Keith Dinnie The employer brand: Bringing the best of brand management to people at work , 2007 .

[8]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media , 2011 .

[9]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Manage marketing by the customer equity test. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[10]  J. Shaw Turnover rates and organizational performance , 2011 .

[11]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[13]  Brigid Carroll,et al.  Leadership Development as Identity Construction , 2010 .

[14]  J. Shaw,et al.  Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance: a Meta-analysis Theoretical Perspectives on the Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance Relationship Model 1: Linear Negative Relationship View from Human and Social Capital Theories Model 2: Attenuated Negative Relationship View from Organization , 2022 .

[15]  Ana Isabel Canhoto,et al.  Bittersweet! Understanding and Managing Electronic Word of Mouth , 2013 .

[16]  Jan Kietzmann,et al.  Crowdsourcing: A revised definition and introduction to new research , 2017 .