Real Options and Escalation of Commitment: A Behavioral Analysis of Capital Investment Decisions

ABSTRACT: This study uses experimental methods to explore whether incorporating real options into net present value analysis can reduce escalation of commitment, or the tendency of decision makers to continue to commit resources to a project after receiving negative feedback. This reduction in escalation behavior should occur because the incorporation of real options offers the user greater cognitive accessibility to the possibility of project abandonment. Findings indicate that users of real options exhibit less escalation of commitment than do users of net present value analysis alone. The main result demonstrates that the use of real options in capital budgeting can affect the behavior and decisions of the user even in an experimental setting that controls for the informational advantage of using real options.

[1]  John Dickhaut,et al.  Escalation Errors and the Sunk Cost Effect: An Explanation Based on Reputation and Information Asymmetries , 1989 .

[2]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology , 1996 .

[3]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[5]  Paul Harrison,et al.  An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers' project evaluation decisions , 1994 .

[6]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF HEURISTICS AND BIASES AFFECTING REAL OPTION VALUATION , 2004 .

[7]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Sunk Costs in the NBA: Why Draft Order Affects Playing Time and Survival in Professional Basketball , 1995 .

[8]  F D Schoorman,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Sonia M. Goltz,et al.  Examining the Joint Roles of Responsibility and Reinforcement History in Recommitment , 1993 .

[10]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure , 1999 .

[12]  Asghar Zardkoohi,et al.  Do Real Options Lead to Escalation of Commitment , 2004 .

[13]  Robert W. Rutledge,et al.  The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers evaluation judgments 1 The da , 1999 .

[14]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Options Thinking and Platform Investments: Investing in Opportunity , 1994 .

[15]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Real Options: Experimental Evidence , 2001 .

[16]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  S. Vickery,et al.  Celebrating the “Essential:” The Impact of Performance on the Functional Favoritism of CEOs in Two Contexts , 1997 .

[18]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Information Systems Project Continuation in Escalation Situations: A Real Options Model , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Benjamin Le,et al.  Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice , 2005 .

[20]  T. Copeland.  Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[21]  M. Keil,et al.  Information systems project escalation: a reinterpretation based on options theory , 1999 .

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Peter Booth,et al.  The Effects of Hurdle Rates on the Level of Escalation of Commitment in Capital Budgeting , 2003 .

[24]  Y. Loewenstein.  The Accounting Review , 1972 .

[25]  S. Myers.  Determinants of corporate borrowing , 1977 .

[26]  Asghar Zardkoohi,et al.  Response: Do Real Options Lead to Escalation of Commitment? , 2004 .

[27]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Organizational decision making: The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal , 1996 .

[28]  Sydney Howell,et al.  Laboratory Evidence on How Managers Intuitively Value Real Growth Options , 1997 .

[29]  R. Calantone,et al.  Escalation of commitment during new product development , 2002 .

[30]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. , 1980 .

[31]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Bounded Rationality Bias in Managerial Valuation of Real Options: Theory and Evidence from IT Projects , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[32]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  Considering the best choice: effects of the salience and accessibility of alternatives on attitude--decision consistency. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[34]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions , 1996 .

[35]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[36]  Diane M. Lander,et al.  Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options , 1998 .

[37]  S. Ross.  Uses, Abuses, and Alternatives to the Net-Present-Value Rule , 1995 .

[38]  J. Busby,et al.  Real Options In Practice: An Exploratory Survey Of How Finance Officers Deal With Flexibility In Capital Appraisal , 1997 .

[39]  Chee W. Chow,et al.  Escalating Commitment to Unprofitable Projects: Replication and Cross-Cultural Extension , 1997 .

[40]  R. Fazio,et al.  The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. , 1999 .

[41]  Frank LandVisiting.  Escalation in Decision Making: The Tragedy of Taurus , 1997 .

[42]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  Understanding Runaway Information Technology Projects: Results from an International Research Program Based on Escalation Theory , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Mandy M. Cheng,et al.  Persistence in Capital Budgeting Reinvestment Decisions - Personal Responsibility Antecedent and Information Asymmetry Moderator: A Note , 2002 .

[44]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World , 1998 .

[46]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations Discussion of "The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role , 2004 .

[47]  Patricia J. Holahan,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[50]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[51]  R. Voeks.  Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1997 .

[52]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[53]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process , 1993 .

[54]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations , 2003 .

[55]  Sydney Howell,et al.  Real Options: Evaluating Corporate Investment Opportunities in a Dynamic World , 2001 .

[56]  D. Hantula,et al.  Hyteresis and Uncertainty: The Effect of Uncertainty on Delays to Exit Decisions. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[57]  L. Warlop,et al.  Benefit salience and consumers' selective attention to product features , 1997 .

[58]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Beyond Behaviorism : On the Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes , 2001 .