Incorporation, plurality, and the incorporation of plurals: a dynamic approach

This paper deals with the semantic properties of incorporated nominals that are present at clausal syntax. Such nominals exhibit a complex cluster of semantic properties, ranging from argument structure, scope, and number to discourse transparency. We develop an analysis of incorporation in the framework of Discourse Representation Theory, a dynamic theory that can connect sentence-level and discourse-level semantics. We concentrate on data from Hungarian, where incorporated nominals may be either morphologically singular or plural. We set out to capture two sets of contrasts: (i) those we find when comparing incorporated nominals on the one hand and their non-incorporated, full-fledged argument sisters on the other, and (ii) those we find when comparing morphologically singular and morphologically plural incorporated nominals. A more elaborate version of the analysis can be found in Farkas and de Swart (2003).

[1]  Andrew L. Thomas,et al.  Ellipsis: The interplay of sentence structure and context , 1979 .

[2]  Veerle van Geenhoven.  Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic , 1998 .

[3]  Peter Coopmans,et al.  Lexical specification and insertion , 2000 .

[4]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts , 2004 .

[5]  M. Mithun.  The evolution of noun incorporation , 1984 .

[6]  Jerrold M. Sadock,et al.  Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation , 1980 .

[7]  Alice ter Meulen,et al.  Genericity: An Introduction , 1995 .

[8]  長沼 圭一.  Georges KLEIBER, Brenda LACA et Liliane TASMOWSKI (eds.) (2001): Typologie des groupes nominaux, Presses Universitaires de Rennes , 2003 .

[9]  H. de Hoop,et al.  Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation , 1996 .

[10]  HANS KAMP,et al.  REMARKS ON LEXICAL STRUCTURE AND DRS CONSTRUCTION , 1994 .

[11]  P. Schlenker.  A Plea For Monsters , 2003 .

[12]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Bare NP's, Reference to Kinds, and Incorporation , 1999 .

[13]  D. Farkas,et al.  The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency , 2003 .

[14]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[15]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[16]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[17]  Anna Szabolcsi.  Background Notions in Lattice Theory and Generalized Quantifiers , 1997 .

[18]  William A. Ladusaw.  Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong , 1994 .

[19]  D. Massam.  Pseudo Noun Incorporation In Niuean , 2001 .

[20]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Cross-linguistic semantics , 1994 .

[21]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[22]  Peter Lasersohn.  Lexical Distributivity and Implicit Arguments , 1993 .

[23]  Jean Mark Gawron,et al.  The Context Dependency of Implicit Arguments , 1996 .

[24]  Georges Kleiber,et al.  Typologie des groupes nominaux , 2001 .

[25]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Restriction and Saturation , 2003 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  A-definites and the Discourse Status of Implicit Arguments , 1999, J. Semant..

[27]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From discourse to logic , 1993 .