Computing material‐selective projection images in MR

We detail a robust, general method for computing projection images of individual materials in a volume as linear combinations of MR projection images with different material‐dependent weightings. Signal per unit volume for each material in each raw image is acquired directly for accurate cancellation of undesired, overlapping materials. The weighted sum of the input images is determined to maximize the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and minimize inhomogeneity effects in the material‐selective images. We tested the implementation experimentally in both phantom and human studies, producing selective images with reasonable SNRs and material isolation. With further develop ment of sequences to rapidly acquire input images having greater material differentiability, we envision the application of the selective projection imaging format to screening studies searching over large volumes for diseased tissues. © 1989 Academic Press, Inc.

[1]  J R MacFall,et al.  Methodology for the measurement and analysis of relaxation times in proton imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  J N Lee,et al.  The contrast‐to‐noise in relaxation time, synthetic, and weighted‐sum MR images , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  A Macovski,et al.  Noise reduction in magnetic resonance imaging , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J P Windham,et al.  Eigenimage Filtering in MR Imaging , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[6]  J C Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. I. Effects of radiofrequency pulse imperfections , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[8]  L Kaufman,et al.  The utility of principal component analysis for the image display of brain lesions. A preliminary, comparative study , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J. Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. II. Effects of static field inhomogeneity , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Robert A. Kruger,et al.  Basic concepts of digital subtraction angiography , 1984 .

[12]  A. Macovski,et al.  Selective Projection Imaging: Applications to Radiography and NMR , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.