CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window

The capacity to diversify genetic codes advances our ability to understand and engineer biological systems1,2. A method for continuously diversifying user-defined regions of a genome would enable forward genetic approaches in systems that are not amenable to efficient homology-directed oligonucleotide integration. It would also facilitate the rapid evolution of biotechnologically useful phenotypes through accelerated and parallelized rounds of mutagenesis and selection, as well as cell-lineage tracking through barcode mutagenesis. Here we present EvolvR, a system that can continuously diversify all nucleotides within a tunable window length at user-defined loci. This is achieved by directly generating mutations using engineered DNA polymerases targeted to loci via CRISPR-guided nickases. We identified nickase and polymerase variants that offer a range of targeted mutation rates that are up to 7,770,000-fold greater than rates seen in wild-type cells, and editing windows with lengths of up to 350 nucleotides. We used EvolvR to identify novel ribosomal mutations that confer resistance to the antibiotic spectinomycin. Our results demonstrate that CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable multiplexed and continuous diversification of user-defined genomic loci, which will be useful for a broad range of basic and biotechnological applications.A system that targets DNA polymerase activity with CRISPR-guided nickases to provide genetic diversification at user-defined loci enables forward genetic approaches.

[1]  Yan Song,et al.  Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells , 2016, Nature Methods.

[2]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[3]  David R. Liu,et al.  Development of potent in vivo mutagenesis plasmids with broad mutational spectra , 2015, Nature Communications.

[4]  E. Schiltz,et al.  Ribosomal proteins , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[5]  J. D. de Boer,et al.  An in vitro assay for frameshift mutations: hotspots for deletions of 1 bp by Klenow-fragment polymerase share a consensus DNA sequence. , 1988, Genetics.

[6]  S. Sarkar,et al.  On fluctuation analysis: a new, simple and efficient method for computing the expected number of mutants , 2004, Genetica.

[7]  Björn Högberg,et al.  Rolling circle replication requires single-stranded DNA binding protein to avoid termination and production of double-stranded DNA , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[9]  X. Xing,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis: A sniper-like diversity generator in microbial engineering , 2017, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.

[10]  Manel Camps,et al.  Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[11]  Margarita Salas,et al.  ϕ29 DNA Polymerase Residue Leu384, Highly Conserved in Motif B of Eukaryotic Type DNA Replicases, Is Involved in Nucleotide Insertion Fidelity* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[13]  Manel Camps,et al.  Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Skirgaila,et al.  In vitro evolution of phi29 DNA polymerase using isothermal compartmentalized self replication technique. , 2016, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[15]  H. Steingrimsdottir,et al.  Mutant sequences in the rpsL gene of Escherichia coli B/r: Mechanistic implications for spontaneous and ultraviolet light mutagenesis , 1992, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[16]  Gaelen T. Hess,et al.  Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells , 2016, Nature Methods.

[17]  R. Bambara,et al.  On the processive mechanism of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Quantitative assessment of processivity. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  J. Drake.  A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Brocklehurst.  Antibiotics for gonorrhoea in pregnancy. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  David R. Liu,et al.  A System for the Continuous Directed Evolution of Biomolecules , 2011, Nature.

[21]  James A. Gagnon,et al.  Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing , 2016, Science.

[22]  P. B. Vander Horn,et al.  A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Jesse J Salk,et al.  Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  A. Greener,et al.  An efficient random mutagenesis technique using anE.coli mutator strain , 1997, Molecular biotechnology.

[25]  K. Jagessar,et al.  Functional and molecular analysis of Escherichia coli strains lacking multiple DEAD-box helicases. , 2010, RNA.

[26]  H. Salis.  The ribosome binding site calculator. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  Chang-Xing Ma,et al.  Fluctuation AnaLysis CalculatOR: a web tool for the determination of mutation rate using Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Side Chains That Influence Fidelity at the Polymerase Active Site of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I (Klenow Fragment)* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Chang C. Liu,et al.  Scalable continuous evolution of genes at mutation rates above genomic error thresholds , 2018, bioRxiv.

[30]  N. Costantino,et al.  Enhanced levels of λ Red-mediated recombinants in mismatch repair mutants , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[32]  L. Blanco,et al.  Primer‐terminus stabilization at the 3′‐5′ exonuclease active site of phi29 DNA polymerase. Involvement of two amino acid residues highly conserved in proofreading DNA polymerases. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[33]  P. Foster,et al.  Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations. , 2000, Methods.