Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement

Social loafing is the tendency of individuals to withhold contributions to a task in a team setting. Team size and dispersion are two primary drivers of social loafing in technology-supported team settings. However, the mechanisms through which these drivers affect social loafing are not well understood. Consequently, the objective of this study is to identify the cognitive mechanisms that mediate the effect of team size and dispersion on social loafing in technology-supported teams. Drawing on the theory of moral disengagement, we posit that three primary cognitive mechanisms—diffusion of responsibility, attribution of blame, and dehumanization—will mediate the effect of team size and dispersion on social loafing. We conducted a laboratory study involving 140 students randomly assigned to 32 teams performing a brainstorming task using group systems software. The results show that diffusion of responsibility, attribution of blame, and dehumanization all mediate (partially) the effects of team size on social loafing. Meanwhile, only dehumanization mediates (fully) the effect of dispersion on social loafing.

[1]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[2]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Causal Relationships in Creative Problem Solving: Comparing Facilitation Interventions for Ideation , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  C. Moore.  Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption , 2008 .

[4]  Albert Bandura,et al.  The role of selective moral disengagement in terrorism and counterterrorism. , 2004 .

[5]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[6]  Jeroen Vaes,et al.  Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups , 2001 .

[7]  M. Lind.  The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups , 1999 .

[8]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[10]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[11]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[13]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[14]  Terence Connolly,et al.  On the Effectiveness of Group Brainstorming , 1993 .

[15]  J. George.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations , 1992 .

[16]  Americus Reed,et al.  A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war , 2007 .

[17]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Values, Stereotypes, and Intergroup Antagonism , 1989 .

[18]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Selective Exercise of Moral Agency , 2004 .

[21]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Marcus K. Rogers,et al.  A social learning theory and moral disengagement analysis of criminal computer behavior: an exploratory study , 2001 .

[23]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Gareth R. Jones.  Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior , 1984 .

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[26]  S. Milgram.  Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View , 1975 .

[27]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[28]  Glenn E. Littlepage.  Effects of Group Size and Task Characteristics on Group Performance: A Test of Steiner's Model , 1991 .

[29]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[30]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[31]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Decreased helpfulness with increased group size through lessening the effects of the needy individual's dependency1 , 1978 .

[32]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[33]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[35]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[36]  Gian Vittorio Caprara,et al.  Moral civic disengagement and values , 2005 .

[37]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management. , 1987 .

[38]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Effects of Group Size on Cognitive Effort and Evaluation , 1977 .

[39]  K. H. Price.  Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing , 1987 .

[40]  R. Watson.  A study of group decision support system use in three and four-person groups for a preference alloca , 1987 .

[41]  N. Kerr,et al.  Ringelmann Revisited , 1981 .

[42]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[43]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Misattribution in virtual groups : The effects of member distribution on self-serving bias and partner blame , 2007 .

[44]  S. Harkins,et al.  Social loafing and group evaluation. , 1989 .

[45]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[46]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[47]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[48]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[49]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[50]  Kaori Sato.  Trust and group size in a social dilemma , 1988 .

[51]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[52]  John McAvoy,et al.  Looking for a place to hide: a study of social loafing in agile teams , 2006, ECIS.

[53]  William Remus,et al.  Will behavioral research on managerial decision making generalize to managers , 1996 .

[54]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[55]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[56]  David A Harrison,et al.  Withholding inputs in team contexts: member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[58]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[59]  T. Jones.  Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model , 1991 .

[60]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[61]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[62]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Self-Serving Attributions for Individual and Group Performance , 1987 .

[63]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[64]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test , 1988 .

[65]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[66]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Group Support Systems on Group Meetings , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  J. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Numerical and Logical Group Size on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1995 .

[68]  Herbert G. Kelman.  Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers , 1973 .

[69]  C. Cramton.  Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. , 2002 .

[70]  A. Hare.  A Study of Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups , 1952 .

[71]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[72]  A. Montagu,et al.  The Dehumanization Of Man , 1983 .

[73]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[74]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[75]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Research Note. Electronic Brainstorming: Illusions and Patterns of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[76]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[77]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[78]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[79]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[80]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  On the Measurement of Ideation Quality , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[82]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes , 1999, MIS Q..

[84]  J. George,et al.  Physical Proximity Effects on Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation , 1994 .

[85]  K. Williams,et al.  Social Loafing and Swimming: Effects of Identifiability on Individual and Relay Performance of Intercollegiate Swimmers , 1989 .

[86]  Irving M. Lane,et al.  A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 1988 .

[87]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[88]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[89]  N. Haslam.  Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[90]  E. Salas,et al.  Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance , 2003 .

[91]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. , 1985 .

[92]  Tung-Ching Lin,et al.  Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[93]  A. Bandura.  Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 2002 .

[94]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Responsibility, norms, and helping in an emergency. , 1970 .

[95]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory , 2007 .

[96]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research , 1993 .

[97]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms of moral disengagement. , 2011 .

[98]  J. Buffington-Vollum,et al.  Moral Disengagement and Attitudes about Violence toward Animals , 2004 .

[99]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[100]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[101]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Will computers dehumanize education? A grounded approach to values at risk , 1998 .

[102]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. , 1997 .

[104]  A. Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 1996 .

[105]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion , 1993 .

[106]  S. Harkins,et al.  Social Loafing and Self-Evaluation With a Social Standard , 2004 .

[107]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control , 1990 .

[108]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .