Drop size distribution comparisons between Parsivel and 2-D video disdrometers

Abstract. Measurements from a 2-D video disdrometer (2DVD) have been used for drop size distribution (DSD) comparisons with co-located Parsivel measurements in Huntsville, Alabama. The comparisons were made in terms of the mass-weighted mean diameter, Dm, the standard deviation of the mass-spectrum, σm, and the rainfall rate, R, all based on 1-min DSD from the two instruments. Time series comparisons show close agreement in all three parameters for cases where R was less than 20 mm h−1. In four cases, discrepancies in all three parameters were seen for "heavy" events, with the Parsivel showing higher Dm, σm and R, when R reached high values (particularly above 30 mm h−1). Possible causes for the discrepancies include the presence of a small percentage of non-fully melted hydrometers, with higher than expected fall velocity and with very different axis ratios as compared with rain, indicating small hail or ice pellets or graupel. We also present here Parsivel-to-Parsivel comparisons as well as comparisons between two 2DVD instruments, namely a low-profile unit and the latest generation, "compact unit" which was installed at the same site in November 2009. The comparisons are included to assess the variability between the same types of instrument. Correlation coefficients and the fractional standard errors are compared.

[1]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment , 2010 .

[2]  P. I. A. Kinnell,et al.  Some Observations on the Joss-Waldvogel Rainfall Disdrometer , 1976 .

[3]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  Uncertainties in the Rain Profiling Algorithm for the TRMM Precipitation Radar(1. Precipitation Radar (PR), Precipitation Measurements from Space) , 2009 .

[4]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Analysis of Video Disdrometer and Polarimetric Radar Data to Characterize Rain Microphysics in Oklahoma , 2008 .

[5]  Francisco J. Tapiador,et al.  An experiment to measure the spatial variability of rain drop size distribution using sixteen laser disdrometers , 2010 .

[6]  R. C. Srivastava,et al.  Doppler radar characteristics of precipitation at vertical incidence , 1973 .

[7]  S. Michaelides Precipitation: Advances in Measurement, Estimation and Prediction , 2008 .

[8]  V. Bringi,et al.  Rain microstructure from polarimetric radar and advanced disdrometers , 2008 .

[9]  R. Gunn,et al.  THE TERMINAL VELOCITY OF FALL FOR WATER DROPLETS IN STAGNANT AIR , 1949 .

[10]  Michael Schönhuber,et al.  Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters of Distrometer Data With Different Bin Sizes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Christian D. Kummerow,et al.  Global Precipitation Measurement , 2008 .

[12]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Two-dimensional video disdrometer: A description , 2002 .

[13]  V. N. Bringi,et al.  Orientation Angle Distributions of Drops after an 80-m Fall Using a 2D Video Disdrometer , 2008 .

[14]  M. Löffler-Mang,et al.  An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors , 2000 .

[15]  Peter T. May,et al.  Using Dual-Polarized Radar and Dual-Frequency Profiler for DSD Characterization: A Case Study from Darwin, Australia , 2009 .

[16]  W. Krajewski,et al.  Estimation of Rainfall Interstation Correlation , 2001 .

[17]  Carlton W. Ulbrich,et al.  Rainfall Microphysics and Radar Properties: Analysis Methods for Drop Size Spectra , 1998 .