Tubes and bubbles topological confinement of YouTube recommendations

The role of recommendation algorithms in online user confinement is at the heart of a fast-growing literature. Recent empirical studies generally suggest that filter bubbles may principally be observed in the case of explicit recommendation (based on user-declared preferences) rather than implicit recommendation (based on user activity). We focus on YouTube which has become a major online content provider but where confinement has until now been little-studied in a systematic manner. We aim to contribute to the above literature by showing whether recommendation on YouTube exhibits phenomena typical of filter bubbles, tending to lower the diversity of consumed content. Starting from a diverse number of seed videos, we first describe the properties of the sets of suggested videos in order to design a sound exploration protocol able to capture latent recommendation graphs recursively induced by these suggestions. These graphs form the background of potential user navigations along non-personalized recommendations. From there, be it in topological, topical or temporal terms, we show that the landscape of what we call mean-field YouTube recommendations is often prone to confinement dynamics. Moreover, the most confined recommendation graphs i.e., potential bubbles, seem to be organized around sets of videos that garner the highest audience and thus plausibly viewing time.

[1]  Jiangchuan Liu,et al.  Statistics and Social Network of YouTube Videos , 2008, 2008 16th Interntional Workshop on Quality of Service.

[2]  Massimo Airoldi,et al.  Follow the algorithm: an exploratory investigation of music on YouTube , 2016 .

[3]  Steven L. Johnson,et al.  Open media or echo chamber: the use of links in audience discussions on the Facebook Pages of partisan news organizations , 2016 .

[4]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Camille Roth,et al.  Algorithmic Distortion of Informational Landscapes , 2019, Intellectica. Revue de l'Association pour la Recherche Cognitive.

[6]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Letting Users Choose Recommender Algorithms: An Experimental Study , 2015, RecSys.

[7]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[8]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Quantifying Controversy on Social Media , 2018, ACM Trans. Soc. Comput..

[9]  Yu He,et al.  The YouTube video recommendation system , 2010, RecSys '10.

[10]  Nicola Barbieri,et al.  Evolution of Ego-networks in Social Media with Link Recommendations , 2017, WSDM.

[11]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Bursting your (filter) bubble: strategies for promoting diverse exposure , 2013, CSCW '13.

[12]  Neil Thurman,et al.  THE FUTURE OF PERSONALIZATION AT NEWS WEBSITES , 2012 .

[13]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube , 2019, FAT*.

[14]  Lixin Gao,et al.  The impact of YouTube recommendation system on video views , 2010, IMC '10.

[15]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget , 2013, ICWSM.

[16]  Andreas Graefe,et al.  Burst of the Filter Bubble? , 2018 .

[17]  Jilin Zhang,et al.  How YouTube videos are discovered and its impact on video views , 2015, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[18]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[19]  Harald Steck,et al.  Item popularity and recommendation accuracy , 2011, RecSys '11.

[20]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Speak little and well: recommending conversations in online social streams , 2011, CHI.

[22]  Sean J. Westwood,et al.  Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media , 2014, Commun. Res..

[23]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity , 2014, WWW.

[24]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[25]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? , 2022 .

[26]  Mor Naaman,et al.  A Data-Driven Study of View Duration on YouTube , 2016, ICWSM.

[27]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Changing Their Tune: How Consumers' Adoption of Online Streaming Affects Music Consumption and Discovery , 2017, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Ivan B. Dylko,et al.  The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Damian Trilling,et al.  Should We Worry About Filter Bubbles? , 2016 .

[30]  Fabien Tarissan,et al.  Investigating the lack of diversity in user behavior: The case of musical content on online platforms , 2020, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Damian Trilling,et al.  Do not blame it on the algorithm: an empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity , 2018 .

[32]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[33]  Rebecca Gray,et al.  Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed , 2015, CHI.

[34]  Paul Covington,et al.  Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations , 2016, RecSys.