Targeting MET and EGFR crosstalk signaling in triple-negative breast cancers

There is a vital need for improved therapeutic strategies that are effective in both primary and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Current treatment options for TNBC patients are restricted to chemotherapy; however tyrosine kinases are promising druggable targets due to their high expression in multiple TNBC subtypes. Since coexpression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) can promote signaling crosstalk and cell survival in the presence of kinase inhibitors, it is likely that multiple RTKs will need to be inhibited to enhance therapeutic benefit and prevent resistance. The MET and EGFR receptors are actionable targets due to their high expression in TNBC; however crosstalk between MET and EGFR has been implicated in therapeutic resistance to single agent use of MET or EGFR inhibitors in several cancer types. Therefore it is likely that dual inhibition of MET and EGFR is required to prevent crosstalk signaling and acquired resistance. In this study, we evaluated the heterogeneity of MET and EGFR expression and activation in primary and metastatic TNBC tumorgrafts and determined the efficacy of MET (MGCD265 or crizotinib) and/or EGFR (erlotinib) inhibition against TNBC progression. Here we demonstrate that combined MET and EGFR inhibition with either MGCD265 and erlotinib treatment or crizotinib and erlotinib treatment were highly effective at abrogating tumor growth and significantly decreased the variability in treatment response compared to monotherapy. These results advance our understanding of the RTK signaling architecture in TNBC and demonstrate that combined MET and EGFR inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for TNBC patients.

[1]  X. Chen,et al.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  J. Farndon,et al.  EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR STATUS AS PREDICTOR OF EARLY RECURRENCE OF AND DEATH FROM BREAST CANCER , 1987, The Lancet.

[3]  N. Hanna,et al.  MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 Signaling , 2008 .

[4]  Ravi Salgia,et al.  Functional expression and mutations of c-Met and its therapeutic inhibition with SU11274 and small interfering RNA in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Cancer research.

[5]  A. Citri,et al.  EGF–ERBB signalling: towards the systems level , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  L. Carey,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience? , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Christensen,et al.  MET Activation Mediates Resistance to Lapatinib Inhibition of HER2-Amplified Gastric Cancer Cells , 2012, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[8]  E. Rimm,et al.  Expression of c‐met is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  N. Normanno,et al.  The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and the PI3K/AKT signalling pathways: role in cancer pathogenesis and implications for therapeutic approaches , 2012, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[10]  S. Morrison,et al.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Fenyo,et al.  Phosphotyrosine Signaling Networks in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Overexpressing Squamous Carcinoma Cells*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  Mark T. W. Ebbert,et al.  Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[13]  E. Lengyel,et al.  C‐Met overexpression in node‐positive breast cancer identifies patients with poor clinical outcome independent of Her2/neu , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[14]  B. Berghuis,et al.  A Novel Multipurpose Monoclonal Antibody for Evaluating Human c-Met Expression in Preclinical and Clinical Settings , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[15]  Charles M Perou,et al.  EGFR associated expression profiles vary with breast tumor subtype , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[16]  Jane Fridlyand,et al.  Widespread potential for growth-factor-driven resistance to anticancer kinase inhibitors , 2012, Nature.

[17]  P. Jänne,et al.  The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[18]  B. Berman,et al.  Quantitative imaging for development of companion diagnostics to drugs targeting HGF/MET , 2016, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[19]  R. Salgia,et al.  c-Met Is a Potentially New Therapeutic Target for Treatment of Human Melanoma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Jeffrey A. Porter,et al.  Rescue screens with secreted proteins reveal compensatory potential of receptor tyrosine kinases in driving cancer growth. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[21]  A. Luini,et al.  Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with the “triple-negative” phenotype: prognostic implications of EGFR immunoreactivity , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  MET amplification identifies a small and aggressive subgroup of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of responsiveness to crizotinib. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  A. Welm,et al.  Preclinical Efficacy of Ron Kinase Inhibitors Alone and in Combination with PI3K Inhibitors for Treatment of sfRon-Expressing Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Jorge S Reis-Filho,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Molecular Heterogeneity and Receptor Coamplification Drive Resistance to Targeted Therapy in MET-Amplified Esophagogastric Cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[28]  S. Narod,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Fall into Distinct Classes Based on Their Inferred Signaling Networks , 2013, Science Signaling.

[30]  D. Rimm,et al.  Tissue microarray‐based studies of patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma show that met expression is associated with worse outcome but is not correlated with epidermal growth factor family receptors , 2003, Cancer.

[31]  N. Rosen,et al.  HER kinase activation confers resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibition in MET oncogene-addicted gastric cancer cells , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[32]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Mechanisms of Acquired Crizotinib Resistance in ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancers , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[33]  Luca Toschi,et al.  Preexistence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[34]  L. Trusolino,et al.  Activation of HER family members in gastric carcinoma cells mediates resistance to MET inhibition , 2010, Molecular Cancer.

[35]  P. Harari,et al.  Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members , 2008, Oncogene.

[36]  R. Cardiff,et al.  Met induces mammary tumors with diverse histologies and is associated with poor outcome and human basal breast cancer , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Karl J. Dykema,et al.  Met induces diverse mammary carcinomas in mice and is associated with human basal breast cancer , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced c-MET-amplified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2014 .

[39]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[40]  S. Ethier,et al.  Met and c-Src cooperate to compensate for loss of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity in breast cancer cells. , 2008, Cancer research.

[41]  E. Rimm,et al.  Met expression is associated with poor outcome in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[42]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[43]  B. Berghuis,et al.  MET and ERBB2 Are Coexpressed in ERBB2+ Breast Cancer and Contribute to Innate Resistance , 2013, Molecular Cancer Research.

[44]  D. Rimm,et al.  Met, the hepatocyte growth factor receptor, localizes to the nucleus in cells at low density. , 2006, Cancer research.

[45]  Gordon B Mills,et al.  Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Identifies Novel Subtypes and Targets of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[46]  S. Parsons,et al.  Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate Induces Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation via Protein Kinase Cδ/c-Src Pathways in Glioblastoma Cells* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  K. Miyazaki,et al.  Expression of the hepatocyte growth factor/c‐Met pathway is increased at the cancer front in breast carcinoma , 2001, Pathology international.

[48]  G. Mills,et al.  Definition of PKC-α, CDK6, and MET as therapeutic targets in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2014, Cancer research.