Importance of physical and hydraulic characteristics to unionid mussels: a retrospective analysis in a reach of large river

Interest in understanding physical and hydraulic factors that might drive distribution and abundance of freshwater mussels has been increasing due to their decline throughout North America. We assessed whether the spatial distribution of unionid mussels could be predicted from physical and hydraulic variables in a reach of the Upper Mississippi River. Classification and regression tree (CART) models were constructed using mussel data compiled from various sources and explanatory variables derived from GIS coverages. Prediction success of CART models for presence–absence of mussels ranged from 71 to 76% across three gears (brail, sled-dredge, and dive-quadrat) and 51% of the deviance in abundance. Models were largely driven by shear stress and substrate stability variables, but interactions with simple physical variables, especially slope, were also important. Geospatial models, which were based on tree model results, predicted few mussels in poorly connected backwater areas (e.g., floodplain lakes) and the navigation channel, whereas main channel border areas with high geomorphic complexity (e.g., river bends, islands, side channel entrances) and small side channels were typically favorable to mussels. Moreover, bootstrap aggregation of discharge-specific regression tree models of dive-quadrat data indicated that variables measured at low discharge were about 25% more predictive (PMSE = 14.8) than variables measured at median discharge (PMSE = 20.4) with high discharge (PMSE = 17.1) variables intermediate. This result suggests that episodic events such as droughts and floods were important in structuring mussel distributions. Although the substantial mussel and ancillary data in our study reach is unusual, our approach to develop exploratory statistical and geospatial models should be useful even when data are more limited.

[1]  Leo R. Bodensteiner,et al.  Role of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, and Backwaters in the Winter Survival of Freshwater Drum ( Aplodinotus grunniens ) in the Mississippi River , 1992 .

[2]  A. Christian,et al.  Development and Assessment of a Sampling Design for Mussel Assemblages in Large Streams , 2005 .

[3]  C. Vaughn,et al.  Macroecology of a host‐parasite relationship , 2000 .

[4]  S. Dolédec,et al.  Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case study on invertebrates , 2004 .

[5]  W. Richardson,et al.  Past, Present, and Future Concepts in Large River Ecology How rivers function and how human activities influence river processes , 1995 .

[6]  J. Pitlo,et al.  Largemouth bass response to habitat and water quality rehabilitation in a backwater of the upper Mississippi River , 1995 .

[7]  Andrew D. Caulk,et al.  Best management practices for soft engineering of shoreline , 2000 .

[8]  R. Dorazio,et al.  Relationships between streambed substrate characteristics and freshwater mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) in Coastal Plain streams , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  Daryl Pregibon,et al.  Tree-based models , 1992 .

[10]  S. Mclean,et al.  Turbulent flow over three-dimensional dunes: 2. Fluid and bed stresses , 2003 .

[11]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  Extending community ecology to landscapes , 2002 .

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[13]  James B. Layzer,et al.  Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs , 1995 .

[14]  L. Håkanson A Sediment Penetrometer for in situ Determination of Sediment Type and Potential Bottom Dynamic Conditions , 1986 .

[15]  L. Bartsch,et al.  Strong effects of predation by fishes on an invasive macroinvertebrate in a large floodplain river , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  J. Gore,et al.  Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[17]  Larry J. Weber,et al.  Effects of substrate and hydrodynamic conditions on the formation of mussel beds in a large river , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  Jill Lancaster,et al.  Flow Refugia and the Microdistribution of Lotic Macroinvertebrates , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  Can Large Rivers Be Restored?Most restoration projects are only attempts to rehabilitate selected river sections to a predetermined structure and functio , 1995 .

[20]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Applications of extensive survey techniques to describe freshwater pearl mussel distribution and macrohabitat in the River Spey, Scotland , 2004 .

[21]  James B. Layzer,et al.  Relations between complex hydraulics and the localized distribution of mussels in three regulated rivers , 2001 .

[22]  J. Richardson,et al.  Flow Refugia for Benthic Macroinvertebrates during Flooding of a Large River , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[23]  Charles H. Theiling,et al.  Water Level Management Opportunities for Ecosystem Restoration on the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway , 2004 .

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[25]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[26]  C. Vaughn,et al.  Unionid mussels influence macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in streams , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[28]  D. Strayer,et al.  Microhabitat Use by an Assemblage of Stream-Dwelling Unionaceans (Bivalvia), including Two Rare Species of Alasmidonta , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  J. Downing,et al.  Freshwater mussel abundance and species richness: GIS relationships with watershed land use and geology , 2002 .

[30]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[31]  C. Fremling Ecological history of the Upper Mississippi River , 1960 .

[32]  K. Cuffey,et al.  Freshwater Mussels in a California North Coast Range River: Occurrence, Distribution, and Controls , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[33]  Hamdy Amin Elseramegy CART (Classification and Regression Trees) Program: The Implementation of the CART Program and Its Application to Estimating Attrition Rates. , 1985 .

[34]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Use of Flow Refuges by Unionid Mussels in Rivers , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  D. White,et al.  Assessment of spatial autocorrelation in empirical models in ecology , 2001 .

[36]  Leslie E. Holland-Bartels,et al.  Physical Factors and Their Influence on the Mussel Fauna of a Main Channel Border Habitat of the Upper Mississippi River , 1990, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[37]  J. Richardson,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed river , 2000 .

[38]  Fu‐Chun Wu,et al.  Effect of flow‐related substrate alteration on physical habitat: a case study of the endemic river loach Sinogastromyzon puliensis (Cypriniformes, Homalopteridae) downstream of Chi‐Chi Diversion Weir, Chou‐Shui Creek, Taiwan , 2002 .

[39]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Statistical Models in S , 1991 .

[40]  L Nielsen,et al.  遠地地震のPn波の起源 上部マントルウイスパリング・ギャラリー波の地殻内多重散乱 , 2003 .

[41]  G. Watters Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve , 1992 .

[42]  D. Steinberg CART: Classification and Regression Trees , 2009 .

[43]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[44]  S. R. McLean,et al.  A Model for Flow Over Two‐Dimensional Bed Forms , 1986 .

[45]  M. Sandheinrich,et al.  Temporal and vertical distribution of total ammonia nitrogen and un‐ionized ammonia nitrogen in sediment pore water from the upper Mississippi River , 1996 .

[46]  DAVID L. STRAYER,et al.  Changing Perspectives on Pearly Mussels, North America's Most Imperiled Animals , 2004 .

[47]  Thomas G. Coon,et al.  Relative abundance and growth of mussels (Mollusca: Eulamellibranchia) in pools 8,9 and 10 of the Mississippi River , 1977 .

[48]  J. Michael Scott,et al.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2002 .

[49]  A. Bednarek Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.

[50]  P. Calow,et al.  River Biota: Diversity and Dynamics. , 1997 .

[51]  James Leonard Best,et al.  Measuring velocity and shear stress over dunes with acoustic Doppler profiler , 2004 .

[52]  M. Gangloff,et al.  Spatial Distribution and Habitat Use of the Western Pearlshell Mussel (Margaritifera falcata) in a Western Washington Stream , 2004 .