Helicopter flights with night-vision goggles: Human factors aspects

Night-vision goggles (NVGs) and, in particular, the advanced, helmet-mounted Aviators Night-Vision-Imaging System (ANVIS) allows helicopter pilots to perform low-level flight at night. It consists of light intensifier tubes which amplify low-intensity ambient illumination (star and moon light) and an optical system which together produce a bright image of the scene. However, these NVGs do not turn night into day, and, while they may often provide significant advantages over unaided night flight, they may also result in visual fatigue, high workload, and safety hazards. These problems reflect both system limitations and human-factors issues. A brief description of the technical characteristics of NVGs and of human night-vision capabilities is followed by a description and analysis of specific perceptual problems which occur with the use of NVGs in flight. Some of the issues addressed include: limitations imposed by a restricted field of view; problems related to binocular rivalry; the consequences of inappropriate focusing of the eye; the effects of ambient illumination levels and of various types of terrain on image quality; difficulties in distance and slope estimation; effects of dazzling; and visual fatigue and superimposed symbology. These issues are described and analyzed in terms of their possible consequences on helicopter pilot performance. The additional influence of individual differences among pilots is emphasized. Thermal imaging systems (forward looking infrared (FLIR)) are described briefly and compared to light intensifier systems (NVGs). Many of the phenomena which are described are not readily understood. More research is required to better understand the human-factors problems created by the use of NVGs and other night-vision aids, to enhance system design, and to improve training methods and simulation techniques.

[1]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  S N Roscoe,et al.  Improving Visual Performance through Volitional Focus Control , 1987, Human factors.

[3]  Bruce B. Platt,et al.  Understanding prism adaptation: An individual differences approach , 1975 .

[4]  L. V. Genco,et al.  Horizontal Diplopia Thresholds for Head-Up Displays , 1984 .

[5]  Frank S Pettyjohn,et al.  Use of Inspiratory Minute Volumes in Evaluation of Rotary and Fixed Wing Pilot Workload , 1977 .

[6]  W. Epstein,et al.  NONRELATIONAL JUDGEMENT OF SIZE AND DISTANCE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  M. Miranda,et al.  [The eye as an optical instrument]. , 1978, Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico.

[8]  M. Eysenck.  Attention And Arousal, Cognition And Performance , 1982 .

[9]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  The Origin of the Autokinetic Effect , 1963 .

[10]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Memory and control of action , 1983 .

[11]  V. Hamilton,et al.  Human stress and cognition : an information processing approach , 1979 .

[12]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Attention Theory and Mechanisms for Skilled Performance. , 1983 .

[13]  L W Stone,et al.  Effects of Extended Use of AN/PVS-5 Night Vision Goggles on Helicopter Pilots' Performance, , 1984 .

[14]  Robert W. Verona.  Image intensifiers: Past and present , 1985 .

[15]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Sensitivity to Light , 1986 .

[16]  L F Dell'Osso,et al.  Saccadic velocity characteristics: intrinsic variability and fatigue. , 1979, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[18]  S. Coren,et al.  Lateral preferences and human behavior , 1981 .

[19]  William L. Wolfe,et al.  The Infrared Handbook, Revised Edition , 1985 .

[20]  J. Howard Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Image Forming Systems , 1985 .

[21]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[22]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[23]  S. Anstis,et al.  Intensity versus adaptation and the Pulfrich stereophenomenon. , 1972, Vision research.

[24]  G. E. Tucker.  Some thoughts on the implementation of pilot night vision devices for helicopters , 1984 .

[25]  J. Gibson,et al.  The perceived slant of visual surfaces-optical and geographical. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  R. Hennessy,et al.  Instrument myopia. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Helmet-mounted pilot night vision systems: Human factors issues , 1989 .

[28]  Stanley N. Roscoe,et al.  Bigness Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 1985, Human factors.

[29]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Roger W. Wiley,et al.  Vision with the AN/PVS-5 Night Vision Goggles , 1976 .

[31]  A. B. Nutt.  Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[32]  Nicholas M Simonelli.  The Dark Focus of Visual Accommodation: Its Existence, Its Measurement, Its Effects , 1979 .

[33]  L L SLOAN,et al.  Rate of dark adaptation and regional threshold gradient of the dark-adapted eye; physiologic and clinical studies. , 1947, American journal of ophthalmology.