Distance Matters, Except When It Doesn't: Discontinuities in Virtual Work

Virtual work has become an increasingly common phenomenon in today's organizations. Substantial and continuing changes in organizational processes and IT infrastructure have increased the pace and intensity of working across traditionally impermeable boundaries, enabling diverse forms of collaboration. However, our understanding of the consequences and implications of virtual work still lags and research results have been contradictory. We suggest that some of these inconsistencies have been because the boundaries that characterize virtual work-time, space, culture, organization, and so forth-are objective demarcations that are not uniformly problematic. It is only when those working in virtual settings perceive a boundary to be a discontinuity that it hinders work processes. We develop a model of virtual work that differentiates between boundaries and discontinuities, which helps account for contradictory findings. By examining the process of virtual work in more detail, we can uncover issues that are the underlying cause of problems, rather than deal with the more obvious symptoms that can mask underlying problem. Our model has implications both for research and for those working in virtual environments.

[1]  Vicki R. McKinney,et al.  Maintaining distributed relationships , 2006, CACM.

[2]  Cynthia Stohl,et al.  Organizational Communication: Connectedness in Action , 1995 .

[3]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Can absence make a team grow stronger? , 2004, Harvard business review.

[4]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[5]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[6]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[7]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[10]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[11]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Sensemaking and Design Practices in Large-scale Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration , 2004 .

[12]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[13]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Barriers in spatial interactions and communications , 1990 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Metaphors of virtuality: shaping an emergent reality , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[17]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Process Theory of Competency Rallying in Engineering Projects , 2001 .

[18]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[19]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Durability of online teamworking: patterns of trust , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  M. Bloor.  The Structures of the Life-World , 1975 .

[21]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[22]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Fuzzy Teams: Boundary Disagreement in Distributed and Collocated Teams , 2002 .

[23]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[24]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[25]  S. Raghuram,et al.  Communication Patterns As Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[26]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[27]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality , 1999 .

[28]  E. Hill,et al.  Influences of The Virtual Office on Aspects of Work and Work/Life Balance , 1998 .

[29]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[30]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[31]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[32]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[34]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[36]  Edward M. Roche,et al.  Global Software Teams , 1999 .

[37]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[39]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[40]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  J. L. Stimpert.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research , 1999 .

[42]  Richard M. Zaner,et al.  The Structures of the Life World V2 , 1989 .

[43]  N. Wiley,et al.  The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory , 1988 .

[44]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[45]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[47]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[48]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[49]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring Differences in Employee Turnover Intentions and Its Determinants Among Telecommuters and Non-Telecommuters , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Defining the “virtualness” of groups, teams, and meetings , 1999, SIGCPR '99.