The Effects of Referral Source Supervision

Domestic violence offenders who are court mandated to attend a batterer treatment program are more likely to complete treatment than offenders who voluntarily attend. However, few studies have examined the amount or severity of referral source supervision and its effect on treatment completion. This study uses data from three referral sources in South Carolina (i.e., pretrial intervention, criminal domestic violence court, and summary court) to determine whether higher levels of monitoring during a 26-week hybrid cognitive-behavioral batterer treatment program increase the likelihood of completion among batterers. Results indicate that increased supervision exercised over the clients by the referral source during treatment increases the likelihood that offenders will successfully complete the program. It is recommended that courts and other referring agencies keep attendance records, mandate monthly check-ins with case managers, require defendants to appear in court for follow-up hearings, and dedicate staff to monitor domestic violence cases to increase completion rates among batterers in treatment.

[1]  F. Buttell,et al.  A Large Sample Investigation of Batterer Intervention Program Attrition: Evaluating the Impact of State Program Standards , 2008 .

[2]  A. Klein,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Arrested Batterers, 1995-2005 , 2008, Violence against women.

[3]  Ann H. Crowe,et al.  Findings From an Outcome Examination of Rhode Island's Specialized Domestic Violence Probation Supervision Program , 2008, Violence against women.

[4]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  Does Judicial Monitoring Deter Domestic Violence Recidivism? , 2008, Violence against women.

[5]  Angela R. Gover,et al.  A Specialized Domestic Violence Court in South Carolina , 2007, Violence against women.

[6]  E. Rothman,et al.  Batterer Intervention Program Enrollment and Completion Among Immigrant Men in Massachusetts , 2007, Violence against women.

[7]  Loretta J. Stalans,et al.  Identifying Subgroups at High Risk of Dropping Out of Domestic Batterer Treatment , 2007, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[8]  M. Rempel,et al.  Court Responses to Batterer Program Noncompliance: A National Perspective , 2006 .

[9]  Rekha Mirchandani.  What's So Special about Specialized Courts? The State and Social Change in Salt Lake City's Domestic Violence Court , 2005 .

[10]  S. Eley.  Changing Practices: The Specialised Domestic Violence Court Process , 2005 .

[11]  M. Coulter,et al.  Specialized Domestic Violence Courts , 2005 .

[12]  Lauren B. Cattaneo,et al.  Risk Factors for Reabuse in Intimate Partner Violence , 2005, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[13]  F. Buttell,et al.  Do Batterer Intervention Programs Serve African American and Caucasian Batterers Equally Well? An Investigation of a 26-Week Program , 2005 .

[14]  D. Saunders,et al.  Predictors of Attrition in Two Types of Group Programs for Men Who Batter , 2002, Journal of Family Violence.

[15]  C. Murphy,et al.  Race and Demographic Factors in Treatment Attendance for Domestically Abusive Men , 2001, Journal of Family Violence.

[16]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Predictors of Attrition in a Treatment Program for Battering Men , 1999, Journal of Family Violence.

[17]  R. J. Grusznski,et al.  Who completes batterer's treatment groups? An empirical investigation , 1988, Journal of Family Violence.

[18]  C. Robie,et al.  Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. , 2004, Clinical psychology review.

[19]  Lynette Feder,et al.  A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The broward experiment , 2002 .

[20]  B. Dalton.  Batterer Characteristics and Treatment Completion , 2001 .

[21]  T. Power,et al.  Predictors of Batterer Program Attendance , 2001 .

[22]  Greg Berman,et al.  Problem‐Solving Courts: A Brief Primer , 2001 .

[23]  A. Gerlock.  A PROFILE OF WHO COMPLETES AND WHO DROPS OUT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REHABILITATION , 2001, Issues in mental health nursing.

[24]  E. Gondolf,et al.  The Effect of Perceptions of Sanctions on Batterer Program Outcomes , 2000 .

[25]  Mark M. Gottlieb,et al.  Predictors of Treatment Dropout from a Spouse Abuse Abatement Program , 2000, Behavior modification.

[26]  E. Gondolf.  Mandatory Court Review and Batterer Program Compliance , 2000 .

[27]  J. Daly,et al.  Predictors of Dropout Among Men Who Batter: A Review of Studies With Implications for Research and Practice , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[28]  J. Babcock,et al.  The Relationship Between Treatment, Incarceration, and Recidivism of Battering: A Program Evaluation of Seattle's Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence , 1999 .

[29]  E. Gondolf.  A Comparison of Four Batterer Intervention Systems , 1999 .

[30]  R. K. Hanson,et al.  Attrition From a Male Batterer Treatment Program: Client-Treatment Congruence and Lifestyle Instability , 1996, Violence and Victims.

[31]  Janell D. Schmidt,et al.  Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. , 1992 .

[32]  C. Bowman.  The Arrest Experiments: A Feminist Critique , 1992 .

[33]  D. Saunders,et al.  Legal sanctions and treatment follow-through among men who batter: A multivariate analysis , 1989 .

[34]  A. DeMaris.  Attrition in Batterers' Counseling: The Role of Social and Demographic Factors , 1989, Social Service Review.

[35]  J. Hastings,et al.  Counseling Male Spouse Abusers: Characteristics of Treatment Completers and Dropouts1 , 1989, Violence and Victims.

[36]  R. Berk,et al.  The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. , 1984, American sociological review.

[37]  T. Manschreck,et al.  Violence and Victims , 1976 .

[38]  S. E. Jones.  The Office of Attorney-General , 1969, The Cambridge Law Journal.