A Reform-based Framework for Observing Teaching

For research on teaching to succeed in providing meaningful information, a method to examine teaching in complex classroom settings that is also feasible on a larger scale is needed. Our goal was to design a systematic method for observing classroom teaching that was consistent with reform recommendations and adaptable to large scale use. Our work is embedded in an ongoing urban systemic initiative of a large public school district to reform science and mathematics education. Middle school teachers' enactments of a reform-based science unit were videotaped. Student achievement measures included low, medium, and high cognitive level items developed to match science concepts addressed the unit. Analysis identified specific criteria within seven main analysis categories consistent with reform oriented instructional practices were associated with students' achievement scores. Ideas for adapting this framework to large scale use are discussed.

[1]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2002 .

[2]  R. Shavelson,et al.  On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity , 2002 .

[3]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Technology-Rich Inquiry Science in Urban Classrooms: What are the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy? , 2002 .

[4]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al.  Sticks, Stones, and Ideology: The Discourse of Reform in Teacher Education , 2001 .

[5]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[6]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[7]  D. Ball Bridging Practices , 2000 .

[8]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[9]  J. Remillard Curriculum Materials in Mathematics Education Reform: A Framework for Examining Teachers' Curriculum Development , 1999 .

[10]  William L. Sanders,et al.  Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research , 1998 .

[11]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community , 1998 .

[12]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[13]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Lessons Learned: How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Change in Teaching Mathematics: A Case Study , 1991 .

[16]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  The ideal of Standards and the reality of schools : Needed research , 2001 .

[17]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry Based Science Supported by Technology: Achievement among Urban Middle School Students. , 2000 .