Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade

This paper briefly reviews new indices of trade restrictiveness and trade facilitation that have been developed at the World Bank. The paper also compares the trade impact of different types of trade restrictions applied at the border with the effects of domestic policies that affect trade costs. Based on a gravity regression framework, the analysis suggests that tariffs and non-tariff measures continue to be a significant source of trade restrictiveness for low-income countries despite preferential access programs. This is because the value of trade preferences is quite limited: a new measure of the relative preference margin developed in the paper reveals that this is very low for most country-pairs. Most countries with very good (duty-free) access to a market generally have competitors that have the same degree of access. The empirical analysis suggests that measures to improve logistics performance and facilitate trade are likely to have the greatest positive effects in expanding developing country trade, increasing the trade impacts of lowering remaining border barriers by a factor of two or more.

[1]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Alessandro Nicita,et al.  Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices , 2006 .

[3]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  The Margins of US Trade , 2009 .

[4]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[5]  Scott L. Baier,et al.  Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation , 2009 .

[6]  Z. Qureshi Global monitoring report 2009 : a development emergency , 2009 .

[7]  Alessandro Nicita,et al.  Trade, Production, and Protection Database, 1976-2004 , 2007 .

[8]  J. Bergstrand,et al.  On the Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements , 2002 .

[9]  W. Martin,et al.  PREFERENCE EROSION: THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE , 2006 .

[10]  J. Bergstrand,et al.  Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade? , 2005 .

[11]  M. Lawless,et al.  Deconstructing Gravity: Trade Costs and Extensive and Intensive Margins , 2010 .

[12]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  Measurement of Nontariff Barriers , 1997 .

[13]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  Caroline Freund,et al.  Trading on Time , 2006 .

[15]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters Ii: Updated Indicators for 2000-01 , 2002 .

[16]  Stefano Scarpetta,et al.  Regulation, Productivity and Growth , 2003 .

[17]  P. Low,et al.  Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in Nama , 2005 .

[18]  A. Venables,et al.  Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade , 2001 .

[19]  Ben Shepherd,et al.  Transparency and Regional Integration in the Asia Pacific , 2009 .

[20]  Import Demand Elasticities and Trade Distortions , 2004 .

[21]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[22]  Martijn Burger,et al.  On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-Inflated Estimation , 2009 .

[23]  John W. McArthur,et al.  The Growth Competitiveness Index: Measuring Technological Advancement and the Stages of Development , 2001 .

[24]  Ben Shepherd,et al.  Transparency and trade facilitation in the Asia Pacific : estimating the gains from reform , 2007 .

[25]  J. Francois,et al.  Institutions, Infrastructure and Trade , 2007 .

[26]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  The Margins of US Trade (Long Version) , 2009 .

[27]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004 .

[28]  Catherine L. Mann,et al.  Trade Facilitation and Economic Development : New Approach to Quantifying the Impact , 2003 .