A Bayesian Framework for Prediction of Seismic Ground Motion

Abstract Current needs of the site-specific hazard and risk analysis for critical facilities and accumulation of the observed records make the development of site-specific ground-motion attenuation relationship feasible. The use of the site-specific attenuation relationship has two advantages: lack of bias and representation of the specific site. This study develops the site-specific attenuation relationship within the Bayesian updating framework. Rather than developing new attenuation relationships, we develop a correction term to the existing past attenuation equation within the Bayesian framework. The correction term is described as a linear function of source magnitude and distance. New data are those observed at the specific site in recent years. Although the use of a prior distribution is one of the most controversial issues of the Bayes’ theorem, both the noninformative prior and the informative prior in terms of the gamma-normal prior are used to develop the posterior distribution for the prediction of ground motion. We feel that the reader should focus on the development of the site-specific attenuation relationship and quantification of the uncertainty of ground-motion prediction. Statistical uncertainty has been ignored in the existing attenuation relationships, while it is not ignorable in the site-specific attenuation relationship due to the limited number of data available at the specific site. This is particularly notable for the ground-motion prediction of large-magnitude-near-source earthquakes where seismic hazard is sensitive. Because the unknown parameters are treated as random variables in the Bayesian approach, the statistical uncertainty associated with them can be quantified in terms of the posterior distribution. The Bayesian methodology will be an effective approach to updating the attenuation relationship on a site basis when new data from observations become available.

[1]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Strong Motion Attenuation Relations: A Ten-Year Perspective , 1985 .

[2]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification) , 1994 .

[3]  N. N. Ambraseys The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in europe , 1995 .

[4]  R. Mcguire Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[5]  S. D. Werner Procedures for developing vibratory ground motion criteria at nuclear plant sites , 1976 .

[6]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[7]  N. Abrahamson Statistical properties of peak ground accelerations recorded by the SMART 1 array , 1988 .

[8]  Chris H. Cramer,et al.  Site-Specific Seismic-Hazard Analysis that is Completely Probabilistic , 2003 .

[9]  Armen Der Kiureghian Bayesian Analysis of Model Uncertainty in Structural Reliability , 1991 .

[10]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[11]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  The Theory of Probability , 1896 .

[12]  ATTENUATION RELATION OF JMA SEISMIC INTENSITY APPLICABLE TO NEAR SOURCE REGION , 2006 .

[13]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Further analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data , 1985 .

[14]  S. Midorikawa,et al.  NEW ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIPS FOR PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION AND VELOCITY CONSIDERING EFFECTS OF FAULT TYPE AND SITE CONDITION , 1999 .

[15]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  N. A. Abrahamson,et al.  A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Y. Fukushima,et al.  Reply to T. Masuda and M. Ohtake's “Comment on ‘A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan’” , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Mario Ordaz,et al.  Bayesian Attenuation Regressions: an Application to Mexico City , 1994 .

[19]  David M. Boore,et al.  The effect of simple topography on seismic waves: Implications for the accelerations recorded at Pacoima Dam, San Fernando Valley, California , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  G. Bollinger,et al.  The effect of Appalachian Mountain topography on seismic waves , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[22]  Lyle D. Broemeling,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Linear Models. , 1986 .

[23]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TOPOGRAPHY ON EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION: A REVIEW AND NEW RESULTS , 1988 .

[24]  Min Wang,et al.  A BAYESIAN UPDATING FRAMEWORK FOR PREDICTION OF SITE-SPECIFIC SEISMIC GROUND MOTION , 2006 .

[25]  W. Silva,et al.  Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes , 1997 .

[26]  John Douglas,et al.  How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be , 2001 .

[27]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Single-Station Sigma , 2006 .

[28]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .

[29]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data , 1984 .

[30]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[31]  David M. Boore,et al.  Prediction of earthquake response spectra , 1982 .

[32]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Design Spectra for Nuclear Power Plants , 1976 .

[33]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration , 1981 .