Medical physics practice guideline 4.b: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists

Abstract The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the US. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the US. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: Must and must not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. While must is the term to be used in the guidelines, if an entity that adopts the guideline has shall as the preferred term, the AAPM considers that must and shall have the same meaning. Should and should not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances.

[1]  Naichang Yu,et al.  Combining automatic plan integrity check (APIC) with standard plan document and checklist method to reduce errors in treatment planning , 2020, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  Vikren Sarkar,et al.  Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment , 2020, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  D. Marx Patient Safety and the Just Culture. , 2019, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[4]  G. Tracton,et al.  Developing and assessing electronic checklists for safety mindfulness, workload, and performance. , 2018, Practical radiation oncology.

[5]  R. Vdovjak,et al.  Design and implementation of a platform for configuring clinical dynamic safety checklist applications , 2018, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering.

[6]  J. Mechalakos,et al.  Five years' experience with a customized electronic checklist for radiation therapy planning quality assurance in a multicampus institution. , 2017, Practical radiation oncology.

[7]  Barbara K. Burian,et al.  More Than a Tick Box: Medical Checklist Development, Design, and Use , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  R. A. Bouwman,et al.  Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  Frank A Drews,et al.  Checking the lists: A systematic review of electronic checklist use in health care. , 2017, Journal of biomedical informatics.

[10]  Ting Chen,et al.  A standardized checklist is optimal for patients’ chart check , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. , 2016, Medical physics.

[12]  Gwe-Ya Kim,et al.  Application of systems and control theory-based hazard analysis to radiation oncology. , 2016, Medical physics.

[13]  David Westerly,et al.  Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[14]  C. Rowbottom,et al.  AutoLock: a semiautomated system for radiotherapy treatment plan quality control , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Medical Physics Practice Guideline 4.a: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[16]  Ø. Thomassen,et al.  The effects of safety checklists in medicine: a systematic review , 2014, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  Vythialingam Sathiaseelan,et al.  A comprehensive quality assurance program for personnel and procedures in radiation oncology: value of voluntary error reporting and checklists. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  S. Sutlief,et al.  The structure of incident learning systems for radiation oncology. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Adam P Dicker,et al.  Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  John E. Ziewacz,et al.  Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Quality control quantification (QCQ): a tool to measure the value of quality control checks in radiation oncology. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  John C. Hall,et al.  Patient Safety: A Human Factors Approach , 2012 .

[23]  R. M. Vazquez The Checklist Manifesto How to Get Things Right , 2011 .

[24]  M. Fausett,et al.  How to develop an effective obstetric checklist. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[26]  Pat Croskerry,et al.  Checklists to Reduce Diagnostic Errors , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[27]  D. Goleman Leadership: The Power of Emotional Intelligence , 2011 .

[28]  S. Breen,et al.  Audit of an automated checklist for quality control of radiotherapy treatment plans. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  W. Berry,et al.  Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[30]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Effect of A 19-Item Surgical Safety Checklist During Urgent Operations in A Global Patient Population , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[31]  Dennis Rosen The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right , 2010 .

[32]  E. Copeland,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2010 .

[33]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Clinical review: Checklists - translating evidence into practice , 2009, Critical care.

[34]  W. Berry,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Reality check for checklists , 2009, The Lancet.

[36]  A. Gurses,et al.  Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[37]  B. Hales,et al.  Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[38]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety , 2006 .

[40]  Lucinda Stephenson,et al.  Crucial conversations: tools for talking when the stakes are high. , 2006, Iowa medicine : journal of the Iowa Medical Society.

[41]  Harry Owen,et al.  Errors and Omissions in Anesthesia: A Pilot Study Using a Pilot’s Checklist , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[42]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[43]  R. Boyatzis,et al.  Primal leadership : learning to lead with emotional intelligence , 2004 .

[44]  Barrett Caldwell,et al.  Analysis of treatment delivery errors in brachytherapy using formal risk analysis techniques. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  Daniel Boorman,et al.  TODAY'S ELECTRONIC CHECKLISTS REDUCE LIKELIHOOD OF CREW ERRORS AND HELP PREVENT MISHAPS , 2001 .

[46]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Man-made disasters: Why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. , 2000 .

[47]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[48]  Bruce Thomadsen,et al.  Achieving Quality in Brachytherapy , 1999 .

[49]  Asaf Degani,et al.  Cockpit Checklists: Concepts, Design, and Use , 1993 .

[50]  Earl L. Wiener,et al.  Human factors of flight-deck checklists: The normal checklist , 1990 .

[51]  M. Aigner Checking the checklist. , 1988, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[52]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .