The curious case of the hydrated proton.

Understanding the hydrated proton is a critically important problem that continues to engage the research efforts of chemists, physicists, and biologists because of its involvement in a wide array of phenomena. Only recently have several unique properties of the hydrated proton been unraveled through computer simulations. One such process is the detailed molecular mechanism by which protons hop between neighboring water molecules, thus giving rise to the anomalously high diffusion of protons relative to other simple cations. Termed Grotthuss shuttling, this process occurs over multiple time and length scales, presenting unique challenges for computer modeling and simulation. Because the hydrated proton is in reality a dynamical electronic charge defect that spans multiple water molecules, the simulation methodology must be able to dynamically readjust the chemical bonding topology. This reactive nature of the chemical process is automatically captured with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation methods, where the electronic degrees of freedom are treated explicitly. Unfortunately, these calculations can be prohibitively expensive for more complex proton solvation and transport phenomena in the condensed phase. These AIMD simulations remain extremely valuable, however, in validating empirical models, verifying results, and providing insight into molecular mechanisms. In this Account, we discuss recent progress in understanding the solvation and transport properties of the hydrated excess proton. The advances are based on results obtained from reactive molecular dynamics simulations using the multistate empirical valence bond (MS-EVB) methodology. This approach relies on a dynamic linear combination of chemical bond topologies to model charge delocalization and dynamic bonding environments. When parametrized via a variational force-matching algorithm from AIMD trajectories, the MS-EVB method can be viewed as a multiscale bridging of ab initio simulation results to a simpler and more efficient representation. The process allows sampling of longer time and length scales, which would normally be too computationally expensive with AIMD alone. With the MS-EVB methodology, the statistically important components of the excess proton solvation and hopping mechanisms in liquid water have been identified. The most likely solvation structure for the hydrated proton is a distorted Eigen-type complex (H(9)O(4)(+)). In this state, the excess proton charge defect rapidly resonates between three possible distorted Eigen-type structures until a successful proton hop occurs. This process, termed the "special-pair dance", serves as a kind of preparatory phase for the proton hopping while the neighboring water hydrogen-bonding network fluctuates and ultimately rearranges to facilitate a proton hop. The modifications of the solvation structure and transport properties of the excess proton in concentrated acid solutions were further investigated. The Eigen-type solvation structure also possesses both "hydrophilic" and "hydrophobic" sides, which accounts for the affinity of the hydrated proton for the air-water interface. This unusual "amphiphilic" character of the hydrated proton further leads to the metastable formation of contact ion pairs between two hydrated protons. It also engenders a surprisingly constant degree of solubility of hydrophobic species as a function of acid concentration, which contrasts with a markedly variable solubility as a function of salt (such as NaCl or KCl) concentration.

[1]  Jessica M J Swanson,et al.  Proton solvation and transport in aqueous and biomolecular systems: insights from computer simulations. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  H J Bakker,et al.  Structure dynamics of the proton in liquid water probed with terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[3]  G. Voth,et al.  Proton solvation and transport in hydrated nafion. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  Jessica M J Swanson,et al.  Role of charge transfer in the structure and dynamics of the hydrated proton. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  R. Saykally,et al.  On the nature of ions at the liquid water surface. , 2006, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[6]  Timothy C. Berkelbach,et al.  Concerted hydrogen-bond dynamics in the transport mechanism of the hydrated proton: a first-principles molecular dynamics study. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[7]  Car,et al.  Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density-functional theory. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[8]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Effective force fields for condensed phase systems from ab initio molecular dynamics simulation: a new method for force-matching. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Ab Initio Calculations of Free Energy Barriers for Chemical Reactions in Solution , 1995 .

[10]  Gregory A. Voth,et al.  The hydrated proton at the water liquid/vapor interface , 2004 .

[11]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Efficient Approach to Reactive Molecular Dynamics with Accurate Forces. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  Gregory A. Voth,et al.  Multistate Empirical Valence Bond Model for Proton Transport in Water , 1998 .

[13]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Defining Condensed Phase Reactive Force Fields from ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations: The Case of the Hydrated Excess Proton. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[14]  M. Tuckerman,et al.  Connecting solvation shell structure to proton transport kinetics in hydrogen-bonded networks via population correlation functions. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[15]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Effective force field for liquid hydrogen fluoride from ab initio molecular dynamics simulation using the force-matching method. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  G. Voth,et al.  Unusual "amphiphilic" association of hydrated protons in strong acid solution. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  M. Parrinello,et al.  The nature of the hydrated excess proton in water , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Special pair dance and partner selection: elementary steps in proton transport in liquid water. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  Hadas Lapid,et al.  A bond-order analysis of the mechanism for hydrated proton mobility in liquid water. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  G. Voth,et al.  Kinetics of proton migration in liquid water. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  G. Voth,et al.  Elucidation of the proton transport mechanism in human carbonic anhydrase II. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  N. Agmon,et al.  The Grotthuss mechanism , 1995 .

[23]  G. Voth,et al.  Unusual hydrophobic interactions in acidic aqueous solutions. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[24]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  An improved multistate empirical valence bond model for aqueous proton solvation and transport. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[25]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Hydrated excess proton at water-hydrophobic interfaces. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  R. Saykally,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF I ONS AT THELIQUID WATER SURFACE , 2006 .

[27]  K. Kreuer,et al.  Proton transport mechanism in concentrated aqueous solutions and solid hydrates of acids , 1991 .

[28]  James B. Adams,et al.  Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method , 1993, cond-mat/9306054.

[29]  Sandro Scandolo,et al.  An ab initio parametrized interatomic force field for silica , 2002 .

[30]  Gregory A. Voth,et al.  A second generation multistate empirical valence bond model for proton transport in aqueous systems , 2002 .

[31]  Gregory A. Voth,et al.  The computer simulation of proton transport in water , 1999 .

[32]  Barbara Kirchner,et al.  Eigen or Zundel ion: news from calculated and experimental photoelectron spectroscopy. , 2007, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[33]  Michiel Sprik,et al.  New generalized gradient approximation functionals , 2000 .

[34]  Yang Song,et al.  Developing ab initio quality force fields from condensed phase quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations through the adaptive force matching method. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  Noam Agmon,et al.  Structure and energetics of the hydronium hydration shells. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[36]  Lingchun Song,et al.  An Effective Hamiltonian Molecular Orbital-Valence Bond (MOVB) Approach for Chemical Reactions Applied to the Nucleophilic Substitution Reaction of Hydrosulfide Ion and Chloromethane. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[37]  Matt K. Petersen,et al.  Characterization of the solvation and transport of the hydrated proton in the perfluorosulfonic acid membrane nafion. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[38]  I. Hertel,et al.  Electron binding energies of hydrated H3O+ and OH-: photoelectron spectroscopy of aqueous acid and base solutions combined with electronic structure calculations. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  A linear-scaling self-consistent generalization of the multistate empirical valence bond method for multiple excess protons in aqueous systems. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[40]  Feng Wang,et al.  Correcting for dispersion interaction and beyond in density functional theory through force matching. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[41]  G. Voth,et al.  Structure and dynamics of concentrated hydrochloric acid solutions. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[42]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  A multistate empirical valence bond description of protonatable amino acids. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[43]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  An empirical valence bond approach for comparing reactions in solutions and in enzymes , 1980 .