Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and α-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat

The role of reinforcers in influencing choice was studied by use of a schedule that included a random intermixing of reinforced and explicitly non-reinforced components. The just-reinforced response had a high likelihood of being repeated (win-stay), although there was no differential reinforcement for doing so, whereas responses just followed by explicit non-reinforcement had a very low probability of repetition (lose-stay). Non-parametric indices based on the theory of signal detection were used to derive a choice measure of reinforcement which was independent of alterations in average response rate. Treatments with d-amphetamine (0.2–4.5 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (0.25–16 mg/kg) and α-flupenthixol (0.03–0.6 mg/kg) showed that changes in the choice measure could be dissociated from changes in the response rate. These findings were supported by extinction and satiation tests.

[1]  Effects of random reinforcement sequences. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  Peter W. Frey,et al.  Sensitivity and responsivity measures for discrimination learning , 1973 .

[3]  Anthony G. Phillips,et al.  Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: Implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[4]  P. Dews Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. , 1958, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[5]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[6]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[7]  H. Anisman,et al.  Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: Home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance , 1979, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  D. Olton,et al.  Animal Behavior Processes , 2022 .

[9]  S. T. Mason,et al.  Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: Evidence against a block of food reward , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[10]  J. Gray Drug Effects on Fear and Frustration: Possible Limbic Site of Action of Minor Tranquilizers , 1977 .

[11]  T. Robbins,et al.  Win-Stay Behaviour in the Rat , 1984 .

[12]  R. Wise,et al.  Diazepam-induced eating and lever pressing for food in sated rats. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  T. Robbins Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs , 1976, Nature.

[14]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .