Mechanism of regulation of hsp70 chaperones by DnaJ cochaperones.

Hsp70 chaperones assist a large variety of protein folding processes within the entire lifespan of proteins. Central to these activities is the regulation of Hsp70 by DnaJ cochaperones. DnaJ stimulates Hsp70 to hydrolyze ATP, a key step that closes its substrate-binding cavity and thus allows stable binding of substrate. We show that DnaJ stimulates ATP hydrolysis by Escherichia coli Hsp70, DnaK, very efficiently to >1000-fold, but only if present at high (micromolar) concentration. In contrast, the chaperone activity of DnaK in luciferase refolding was maximal at several hundredfold lower concentration of DnaJ. However, DnaJ was capable of maximally stimulating the DnaK ATPase even at this low concentration, provided that protein substrate was present, indicating synergistic action of DnaJ and substrate. Peptide substrates were poorly effective in this synergistic action. DnaJ action required binding of protein substrates to the central hydrophobic pocket of the substrate-binding cavity of DnaK, as evidenced by the reduced ability of DnaJ to stimulate ATP hydrolysis by a DnaK mutant with defects in substrate binding. At high concentrations, DnaJ itself served as substrate for DnaK in a process considered to be unphysiological. Mutant analysis furthermore revealed that DnaJ-mediated stimulation of ATP hydrolysis requires communication between the ATPase and substrate-binding domains of DnaK. This mechanism thus allows DnaJ to tightly couple ATP hydrolysis by DnaK with substrate binding and to avoid jamming of the DnaK chaperone with peptides. It probably is conserved among Hsp70 family members and is proposed to account for their functional diversity.

[1]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The NH2-terminal 108 amino acids of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK and are sufficient for lambda replication. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  M. Gething Protein folding: The difference with prokaryotes , 1997, Nature.

[3]  J. Reinstein,et al.  The role of ATP in the functional cycle of the DnaK chaperone system. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  F. Hartl,et al.  The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  Levels of DnaK and DnaJ provide tight control of heat shock gene expression and protein repair in Escherichia coli , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  J. Reinstein,et al.  GrpE accelerates nucleotide exchange of the molecular chaperone DnaK with an associative displacement mechanism. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[7]  M. Cheetham,et al.  Regulation of 70-kDa heat-shock-protein ATPase activity and substrate binding by human DnaJ-like proteins, HSJ1a and HSJ1b. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[8]  A. Fink,et al.  Molecular chaperones in the life cycle of proteins : structure, function, and mode of action , 1998 .

[9]  A. Karzai,et al.  A Bipartite Signaling Mechanism Involved in DnaJ-mediated Activation of the Escherichia coli DnaK Protein (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The DnaJ chaperone catalytically activates the DnaK chaperone to preferentially bind the sigma 32 heat shock transcriptional regulator. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F. Hartl,et al.  DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE form a cellular chaperone machinery capable of repairing heat‐induced protein damage. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[12]  F. Hartl,et al.  Regulation of the Heat-shock Protein 70 Reaction Cycle by the Mammalian DnaJ Homolog, Hsp40* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  A Valencia,et al.  Mutations in the DnaK chaperone affecting interaction with the DnaJ cochaperone. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  H. Bujard,et al.  Physical interaction between heat shock proteins DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE and the bacterial heat shock transcription factor σ 32 , 1992, Cell.

[15]  J. Schneider-Mergener,et al.  Regulatory region C of the E. coli heat shock transcription factor, sigma32, constitutes a DnaK binding site and is conserved among eubacteria. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  T. Rapoport,et al.  J proteins catalytically activate Hsp70 molecules to trap a wide range of peptide sequences. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[17]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The Conserved G/F Motif of the DnaJ Chaperone Is Necessary for the Activation of the Substrate Binding Properties of the DnaK Chaperone (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  A. Valencia,et al.  A conserved loop in the ATPase domain of the DnaK chaperone is essential for stable binding of GrpE , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Auxilin-induced interaction of the molecular chaperone Hsc70 with clathrin baskets. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[21]  B. Bukau,et al.  The DnaK Chaperone System of Escherichia coli: Quaternary Structures and Interactions of the DnaK and GrpE Components (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  F. Hartl Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[23]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  The Hsp70 and Hsp60 Chaperone Machines , 1998, Cell.

[24]  P. Christen,et al.  Control of the DnaK Chaperone Cycle by Substoichiometric Concentrations of the Co-chaperones DnaJ and GrpE* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Craig M. Ogata,et al.  Structural Analysis of Substrate Binding by the Molecular Chaperone DnaK , 1996, Science.

[26]  W. Kelley,et al.  The J-domain family and the recruitment of chaperone power. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[27]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Reinstein,et al.  The second step of ATP binding to DnaK induces peptide release. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  E. Craig,et al.  The Dissociation of ATP from hsp70 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Stimulated by Both Ydj1p and Peptide Substrates (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  R. Seidel,et al.  Functional properties of the molecular chaperone DnaK from Thermus thermophilus. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  C. Gross,et al.  Interaction of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone, DnaK, with its cochaperone DnaJ. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Landry,et al.  Role of the J-domain in the cooperation of Hsp40 with Hsp70. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Silver,et al.  Eukaryotic DnaJ homologs and the specificity of Hsp70 activity , 1993, Cell.

[34]  H. Bujard,et al.  A cycle of binding and release of the DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE chaperones regulates activity of the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor sigma32. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J. Rothman,et al.  Peptide binding and release by proteins implicated as catalysts of protein assembly. , 1989, Science.

[36]  Bernd Bakau Molecular Chaperones and Folding Catalysts: Regulation, Cellular Functions and Mechanisms , 1999 .

[37]  P. Christen,et al.  Kinetics of molecular chaperone action. , 1994, Science.

[38]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Role of auxilin in uncoating clathrin-coated vesicles , 1995, Nature.