Spatial and fixation conditions affecting the temporal course of changes in perceived relative distance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Gogel,et al. Perception of the relative distance position of objects as a function of other objects in the field. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[2] Walter C. Gogel,et al. Adjacency and attention as determiners of perceived motion , 1976, Vision Research.
[3] W C Gogel. Depth adjacency and cue effectiveness. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.
[4] E. Wist,et al. The growth of the equidistance tendency over time , 1968 .
[5] W. Gogel,et al. THE TENDENCY TO SEE OBJECTS AS EQUIDISTANT AND ITS INVERSE RELATION TO LATERAL SEPARATION , 1956 .
[6] D E Mitchell,et al. Stereoscopic aftereffects: evidence for disparity-specific neurones in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.
[7] I. Howard,et al. The Effect of Steady Fixation on the Judgement of Relative Depth , 1964 .
[8] W. Gogel,et al. EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.
[9] W. Gogel,et al. The effect of inter-ocular delay and repetition interval on depth perception , 1966 .
[10] E. Wist. The influence of the equidistance tendency on depth shifts resulting from an interocular delay in stimulation , 1968 .
[11] N Long,et al. Stereoscopic depth aftereffects with random-dot patterns. , 1973, Vision research.
[12] E. Wist,et al. The temporal course of the relationship between retinal disparity and the equidistance tendency in the determination of perceived depth , 1974 .