Modeling Regularities in Response Time and Accuracy Data With the Diffusion Model

Diffusion models for simple two-choice decision making have achieved prominence in psychology and neuroscience. The standard model views decision making as a process in which noisy evidence is accumulated until one of the two response criteria is reached, at which point the associated response is made. The criteria represent the amount of evidence needed to make a decision, and they reflect the decision maker’s response biases and speed–accuracy trade-off settings. In this article, we review the regularities in experimental data that a model must explain. These include the relation between accuracy and mean response times, the shapes of response-time distributions for correct and error responses and how they change with experimental variables, and individual differences in response time and accuracy. These relations are sometimes overlooked by researchers, but, taken together, they provide extremely strong tests of models.

[1]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination. , 2013, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy , 2015, Cognition.

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model. , 2013, Psychological review.

[5]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014). , 2014, Psychological review.

[7]  Ehtibar N Dzhafarov,et al.  Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time. , 2014, Psychological review.

[8]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[9]  Philip L. Smith Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[10]  H. Engeland,et al.  Basic Impairments in Regulating the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Predict Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  R Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[12]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision Making as a Window on Cognition , 2013, Neuron.

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making. , 2015, Decision.

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[18]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[19]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Sleep deprivation affects multiple distinct cognitive processes , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[22]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  Perceptual Decisions between Multiple Directions of Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging on Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language , 2003 .

[25]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[26]  H. Huizenga,et al.  Specifying theories of developmental dyslexia: a diffusion model analysis of word recognition. , 2011, Developmental science.

[27]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[28]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT primer , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[29]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[30]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and response times: a comparison of sequential sampling models , 2005 .

[33]  R. Ratcliff A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.