Always on the bright side of life: anti-adhesive properties of insect ommatidia grating

SUMMARY The surface of some insect eyes consists of arrays of cuticular protuberances, which are 50–300 nm in diameter, and are termed corneal nipples or ommatidia gratings. They were widely reported to reduce the reflectance for normally incident light, contributing to camouflage by reducing glare to predators, while furthermore enhancing the intake of light, which is especially important for nocturnal insects. Our preliminary observations suggest a third function: in contrast to the rest of the body, ommatidia of various insects remain clean, even in a heavy contaminated environment. In order to prove such an anti-contamination hypothesis of these structures, we measured the adhesive properties of polymer moulds of insect ommatidia, and compared these data with control surfaces having the same curvature radii but lacking such a nanostructure. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) study and force measurements using an atomic force microscope (AFM) on the eye surfaces of three different insect species, dragonfly Aeshna mixta (Odonata), moth Laothoe populi (Lepidoptera) and fly Volucella pellucens (Diptera), were undertaken. We revealed that adhesion is greatly reduced by corneal grating in L. populi and V. pellucens when compared with their smooth controls. The smooth cornea of A. mixta showed no statistically significant difference to its control. We assume that this anti-adhesive phenomenon is due to a decrease in the real contact area between contaminating particles and the eye's surface. Such a combination of three functions in one nanostructure can be interesting for the development of industrial multifunctional surfaces capable of enhancing light harvesting while reducing light reflection and adhesion.

[1]  Lei Jiang,et al.  The Dry‐Style Antifogging Properties of Mosquito Compound Eyes and Artificial Analogues Prepared by Soft Lithography , 2007 .

[2]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  Precise replication of antireflective nanostructures from biotemplates , 2007 .

[3]  C. Bernhard,et al.  A corneal nipple pattern in insect compound eyes. , 1962, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[5]  C. Bernhard,et al.  Comparative ultrastructure of corneal surface topography in insects with aspects on phylogenesis and function , 1970, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[6]  Thomas Labhart,et al.  Physiological characterization of the compound eye in monarch butterflies with focus on the dorsal rim area , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[8]  R. Olberg,et al.  Eye movements and target fixation during dragonfly prey-interception flights , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  A. Vallbo,et al.  ACCOMMODATION IN MYELINATED NERVE FIBRES OF XENOPUS LAEVIS AS COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF VOLTAGE CLAMP DATA. , 1965, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  S. Gorb,et al.  Visualization of epicuticular grease on the covering wings in the Colorado potato beetle: a scanning probe approach , 2009 .

[12]  Peng Haowei,et al.  3次元遷移金属をドーピングしたアナターゼTiO 2 の電子構造と磁気的特性の第一原理研究 , 2008 .

[13]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Visualisation of Native Surfaces by Two-Step Molding , 2007, Microscopy Today.

[14]  R. Thorp STRUCTURAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS OF BEES (APOIDEA) FOR COLLECTING POLLEN' , 1979 .

[15]  R. Jander Grooming and pollen manipulation in bees (Apoidea): the nature and evolution of movements involving the foreleg , 1976 .

[16]  Å. Bertler,et al.  STUDIES ON 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE STORES IN PINEAL GLAND OF RAT. , 1964, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[17]  A. Møller,et al.  THE INSECT CORNEAL NIPPLE ARRAY. A BIOLOGICA, BROAD-BAND IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER THAT ACTS AS AN ANTIREFLECTION COATING. , 1965, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[18]  Andrew L. Szebenyi Cleaning behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster , 1969 .

[19]  R. B. Singer,et al.  Eye Attached Hemipollinaria in the Hawkmoth and Settling Moth Pollination of Habenaria (Orchidaceae): A Study on Functional Morphology in 5 Species from Subtropical South America , 1997 .

[20]  T. Labhart,et al.  Detectors for polarized skylight in insects: a survey of ommatidial specializations in the dorsal rim area of the compound eye , 1999, Microscopy research and technique.

[21]  A. Spurr A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. , 1969, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[22]  Sverre Myhra,et al.  Putative functions and functional efficiency of ordered cuticular nanoarrays on insect wings. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[24]  Klaus Schönitzer,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF THE ANTENNA CLEANER OF THE HONEYBEE (APIS MELLIFICA) , 1984 .

[25]  David Tabor,et al.  The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  G. W. Miskimen,et al.  Structure and functional aspects of the scotopic compound eye of the sugarcane borer moth , 1981, Journal of morphology.

[27]  D. Stavenga,et al.  Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  K. Kendall The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids , 1971 .

[29]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces , 2008 .

[30]  T. Hlavac Grooming Systems of Insects: Structure, Mechanics , 1975 .

[31]  Frank Wippermann,et al.  Micro-optical artificial compound eyes. , 2006 .

[32]  Andrew R. Parker,et al.  Solar–absorber antireflector on the eye of an Eocene fly (45 Ma) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  B. N. J. Perssona The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids , 2001 .

[34]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.