Capture and evaluation of innovative ideas in early stages of product development

The purpose of this paper is to propose a structured procedure for the capture and evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of product development. The procedure is designed to take account of internal and external factors affecting the value of innovative ideas.,The proposed procedure is based on divergent and convergent approaches to innovation. Ideas are generated and captured using targeted questions and subsequently evaluated using modifications of the Kano model and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Idea evaluation considers four criteria – delight, originality, market share potential and simplicity – which are used to compute an “idea priority number”.,A case study looking at innovations in swimming goggles verified the validity of the proposed procedure. The procedure also supports fact-based decision making and applies a structured perspective to the innovation process that makes it easier to manage.,The case study made use of a pilot survey in which 32 customers participated. Although the case study was only intended as a demonstration of the method’s use, such a sample size could lead to unreliable results in certain cases.,Applications of standard or expanded FMEA do not add value to a product because the main purpose of the approach is to prevent failure. The proposed inversion of FMEA logic combined with customer view via the Kano model offers a method for the structured analysis of product innovations. No similar approach to the evaluation of innovations has so far appeared in the literature.

[1]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model , 2013 .

[2]  Laroche Edouard,et al.  Cardialockプロジェクト:心臓手術用の能動型安定化装置設計 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2011 .

[3]  Li-Fei Chen,et al.  A novel approach to regression analysis for the classification of quality attributes in the Kano model: an empirical test in the food and beverage industry , 2012 .

[4]  P. F. Frutuoso e Melo,et al.  A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA , 2005 .

[5]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[6]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards , 2004 .

[7]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Prioritization of innovation factors by the integration of concurrent function deployment and P diagram with a case study in Sepahan Industry Group , 2013 .

[8]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[9]  Jean Renaud,et al.  Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design , 2010 .

[10]  Yu-Cheng Lee,et al.  A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[12]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export , 2007 .

[13]  Gérson Tontini,et al.  Identifying the impact of incremental innovations on customer satisfaction using a fusion method between importance-performance analysis and Kano model , 2013 .

[14]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  André Ogliari,et al.  Stimulating design team creativity based on emotional values: A study on idea generation in the early stages of new product development processes , 2019, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[16]  Jordi Jaumandreu,et al.  Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth , 2004 .

[17]  G. Tontini Integrating the Kano Model and QFD for Designing New Products , 2007 .

[18]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[19]  Hannu Kärkkäinen,et al.  Role of careful customer need assessment in product innovation management—empirical analysis , 2002 .

[20]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[21]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[22]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines , 2009 .

[24]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Incorporating customer satisfaction into the decision-making process of product configuration: a fuzzy Kano perspective , 2013 .

[25]  Arash Shahin,et al.  A novel approach for supplier selection based on the Kano model and fuzzy MCDM , 2013 .

[26]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The Role of Specificity and Abstraction in Creative Idea Generation , 2004 .

[27]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Creativity of student information system projects: From the perspective of network embeddedness , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Tommi Laukkanen,et al.  Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: A means-end approach , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Gary Davies,et al.  Profiling consumers of own brands and national brands using human personality , 2006 .

[30]  Jan van den Ende,et al.  Subjective Performance Assessment of Innovation Projects , 2010 .

[31]  K. Heilman Possible Brain Mechanisms of Creativity. , 2016, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[32]  Bo Bergman,et al.  On integrating Kano's model dynamics into QFD for multiple product design , 2010, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[33]  Antonio Hidalgo,et al.  Innovation Management Techniques and Tools: A Review from Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[34]  Peter Madzík,et al.  Validation of product quality through graphical interpretation of the Kano model , 2018, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[35]  Robert Phaal,et al.  A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice , 2013 .

[36]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Assessment of Divergent Thinking by means of the Subjective Top-Scoring Method: Effects of the Number of Top-Ideas and Time-on-Task on Reliability and Validity. , 2013, Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts.

[37]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Small details that make big differences: a radical approach to consumption experience as a firm's differentiating strategy , 2014 .

[38]  Ajax Persaud,et al.  Enhancing Synergistic Innovative Capability in Multinational Corporations: An Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[39]  Jukka Riekki,et al.  What if it Switched on the Sun? Exploring Creativity in a Brainstorming Session with Children Through a Vygotskyan Perspective , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  Fang Wu,et al.  Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance , 2016 .

[42]  A. Shahin,et al.  Estimating customer lifetime value for new product development based on the Kano model with a case study in automobile industry , 2015 .

[43]  Jaime Dagostim Picolo,et al.  Which incremental innovations should we offer? Comparing importance–performance analysis with improvement-gaps analysis , 2014 .

[44]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size , 2012 .

[45]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation , 2010 .

[46]  Kaj U. Koskinen,et al.  The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology companies , 2002 .

[47]  R. Baaren,et al.  Creativity: The Role of Unconscious Processes in Idea Generation and Idea Selection. , 2012 .

[48]  Mu-Chen Chen,et al.  Understanding the relationship between service convenience and customer satisfaction in home delivery by Kano model , 2011 .

[49]  Lars Witell,et al.  Classification of quality attributes , 2007 .

[50]  Adam Finn,et al.  Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction , 2011 .

[51]  Pisut Koomsap,et al.  Improving risk assessment for customer-oriented FMEA , 2018 .

[52]  M. D. Bois-Reymond,et al.  The family culture of negotiation—a result of changing parent‐child relationships , 1994 .

[53]  Johann Füller,et al.  Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products , 2007 .

[54]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Divergent thinking and market visioning competence: An early front-end radical innovation success typology , 2014 .

[55]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  OM Forum - Business Model Innovation for Sustainability , 2013, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[56]  R. Dholakia,et al.  A multi‐attribute model of web site interactivity and customer satisfaction , 2009 .

[57]  K. Heilman,et al.  Creative Innovation: Possible Brain Mechanisms , 2003, Neurocase.

[58]  K. Krabbendam,et al.  Sustainable competitive advantage and marketing innovation within firms: A pragmatic approach for Chinese firms , 2009 .

[59]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[60]  Subir Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Does attitudinal loyalty influence behavioral loyalty? A theoretical and empirical study , 2007 .

[61]  Shao-Bin Lin,et al.  A new Kano's evaluation sheet , 2011 .

[62]  A. Camanho,et al.  Performance assessment of construction companies: A study of factors promoting financial soundness and innovation in the industry , 2012 .

[63]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Integration of FMEA and the Kano model , 2004 .

[65]  Zhijian Cui,et al.  Scoring vs. Ranking: An Experimental Study of Idea Evaluation Processes , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[66]  Yasunori Baba,et al.  SOURCES OF SUCCESS IN ADVANCED MATERIALS INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF "CORE RESEARCHERS" IN UNIVERSITY–INDUSTRY COLLABORATION IN JAPAN , 2010 .

[67]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .