Orientation Invariance and Geometric Primitives in Shape Recognition

Although it is generally assumed thot vision is orientation invariant, that is, that shapes can be recognized regardless of viewing angle, there is little evidence that speaks directly to this issue, ond what evidence there is fails to support orientation invariance. We propose an explanation for the previous results in terms of the kinds of shape primitives used by the visual system in achieving orientation invariance: Whereas contours are used at stages of vision thot are not orientation invariant, surfaces and/or volumes are used at stages of vision that are orientotion invariant. The stimuli in previously reported studies were wire forms, which con represented only in terms of contour. In four experiments, testing both short-term and long-term memory for shape, we replicated the previous failures of orientation invariance using wire forms, but found relatively good or perfect orientation invariance with equivalently shaped surfaces.

[1]  M. Corballis Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[2]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Impairments of visual object transforms in monkeys. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  E. Warrington Neuropsychological studies of object recognition. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[6]  L. Cooper Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  When does Human Object Recognition use a Viewer-Centered Reference Frame? , 1990 .

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  I. Rock,et al.  A case of viewer-centered object perception , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[11]  I. Rock,et al.  Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  E. Rolls Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[14]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[16]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[17]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.