Partial surrogate cuts method for network-constrained optimal scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems with demand response

Abstract The integration of different energy systems is believed to enable synergy effects such as reducing costs. The concepts of multi-carrier energy systems have critically influenced the investigations of energy management, and their optimal operations with demand response have gained much importance. However, less research has addressed network constraints, which are important, but would transform the overall problem to one of mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, whose solution would be challenging. This paper develops a network-constrained optimal scheduling model for a heating and power energy system with consideration of the demand response and energy storage systems, and detailed constraints such as the maximum number of switching operations for a storage device are considered. To solve this problem, convex relaxations and reformulation techniques are used so that the problem can leverage popular optimization solvers. To further improve the computational efficiency, the partial surrogate cuts (PSC) method is proposed. Its key idea is to partition the continuous variables into linear and nonlinear variables, and then take full advantage of the model structure. Case studies based on practical systems are implemented to evaluate the formulation and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  Increasing the Flexibility of Combined Heat and Power for Wind Power Integration in China: Modeling and Implications , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Majid Shafiepour Motlagh,et al.  Optimal model development of energy hub to supply water, heating and electrical demands of a cement factory , 2019, Energy.

[3]  Tomislav Pukšec,et al.  Comparison of different model formulations for modelling future power systems with high shares of renewables – The Dispa-SET Balkans model , 2019, Applied Energy.

[4]  T. Brown,et al.  Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system , 2018, Energy.

[5]  Hoay Beng Gooi,et al.  Micro-generation dispatch in a smart residential multi-carrier energy system considering demand forecast error , 2016 .

[6]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Optimal Bidding Strategy of Battery Storage in Power Markets Considering Performance-Based Regulation and Battery Cycle Life , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Richard E. Rosenthal,et al.  GAMS -- A User's Guide , 2004 .

[8]  G. Andersson,et al.  Optimal Power Flow of Multiple Energy Carriers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Luca Moretti,et al.  Assessing the impact of a two-layer predictive dispatch algorithm on design and operation of off-grid hybrid microgrids , 2019 .

[10]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Computational strategies for improved MINLP algorithms , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  Jie Li,et al.  Towards accurate modeling of dynamic startup/shutdown and ramping processes of thermal units in unit commitment problems , 2019 .

[12]  Mohammad E. Khodayar,et al.  Stochastic day-ahead scheduling of multiple energy Carrier microgrids with demand response , 2018, Energy.

[13]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Integrated renewable electricity generation considering uncertainties: The UK roadmap to 50% power generation from wind and solar energies , 2017 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An LP NLP based branch and bound algorithm for MINLP optimization , 1991 .

[15]  Sayyad Nojavan,et al.  A cost-emission framework for hub energy system under demand response program , 2017 .

[16]  Xue Li,et al.  Day-ahead scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems with multi-type energy storages and wind power , 2018, CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems.

[17]  Kwang Y. Lee,et al.  Optimal Day-Ahead Operation Considering Power Quality for Active Distribution Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[18]  Björn Laumert,et al.  An extended energy hub approach for load flow analysis of highly coupled district energy networks: Illustration with electricity and heating , 2018 .

[19]  Amany El-Zonkoly Optimal scheduling of observable controlled islands in presence of energy hubs , 2017 .

[20]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing , 1989 .

[21]  Tengfei Ma,et al.  Energy flow modeling and optimal operation analysis of the micro energy grid based on energy hub , 2017 .

[22]  Ali Reza Seifi,et al.  Simultaneous integrated optimal energy flow of electricity, gas, and heat , 2015 .

[23]  Marcos J. Rider,et al.  Optimal Operation of Distribution Networks Considering Energy Storage Devices , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[24]  Mohammad E. Khodayar,et al.  Coordinated Operation of Electricity and Natural Gas Systems: A Convex Relaxation Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[25]  J. Lavaei,et al.  Conic relaxations of the unit commitment problem , 2017 .

[26]  Wei-Jen Lee,et al.  The optimal structure planning and energy management strategies of smart multi energy systems , 2018, Energy.

[27]  Aouss Gabash,et al.  Active-Reactive Optimal Power Flow in Distribution Networks With Embedded Generation and Battery Storage , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Qian Ai,et al.  Extended multi-energy demand response scheme for industrial integrated energy system , 2018 .

[29]  Adel Akbarimajd,et al.  Generalized modeling and optimal management of energy hub based electricity, heat and cooling demands , 2018, Energy.

[30]  Shahram Jadid,et al.  Optimal electrical and thermal energy management of a residential energy hub, integrating demand response and energy storage system , 2015 .

[31]  Marco Badami,et al.  Optimising energy flows and synergies between energy networks , 2019 .

[32]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Hourly Electricity Demand Response in the Stochastic Day-Ahead Scheduling of Coordinated Electricity and Natural Gas Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[33]  Boming Zhang,et al.  Transmission-Constrained Unit Commitment Considering Combined Electricity and District Heating Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[34]  G. Andersson,et al.  Energy hubs for the future , 2007, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[35]  Naser Nourani Esfetanaj,et al.  Heating hub and power hub models for optimal performance of an industrial consumer , 2017 .

[36]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs , 1986, Math. Program..

[37]  Hassan Barati,et al.  Probabilistic optimization in operation of energy hub with participation of renewable energy resources and demand response , 2019, Energy.

[38]  Mohammad Reza Mohammadi,et al.  Optimal management of energy hubs and smart energy hubs – A review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.