Least action criteria for blind separation of structural modes

It was recently shown that blind source separation (BSS), as originally developed in the signal processing community, can be used in operational modal analysis to separate the responses of a structure into its individual modal contributions. This, in turn, allows the application of simple single-of-degree-freedom techniques to identify the modal parameters of interest. Several publications have recently attempted to give a posteriori physical interpretations to BSS – as initially developed in telecommunication signal processing – when applied to the field of structural dynamics. This paper proposes to follow the route the other way round. It shows that several separation criteria purposely dedicated to operational modal analysis can be deduced from general physical considerations. Three such examples are introduced, based on very different properties that uniquely characterise a structural mode. The first criterion, coined the “principle of shortest envelope”, conjectures that the envelope of a modal response has, among all possible envelopes, the shortest length. That such a principle leads to the governing differential equation of a single-degree-of-freedom oscillator is proved from calculus of variation. The second criterion, coined the “principle of minimum spectral variance”, conjectures that the frequency spectrum of a structural mode is maximally concentrated around its central frequency. Finally, the third criterion, coined the “principle of least spectral complexity”, states that a structural mode has the lowest possible entropy in the frequency domain. All three criteria can be expressed in terms of a mixing matrix whose columns contain the unknown mode shapes. The recovery of the latter is then trivially achieved by minimising the criteria. Extensive simulations show that the proposed criteria lead to figures of merit very similar to those of the state-of-the-art, while at the same time providing physical insight that other algorithms issued form the signal processing community may dramatically lack.

[1]  D. Chelidze,et al.  Blind source separation based vibration mode identification , 2007 .

[2]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics , 2007 .

[3]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  Relating independent components to free-vibration modal responses , 2010 .

[4]  Shashank Chauhan,et al.  Utilization of Blind Source Separation Techniques for Modal Analysis , 2011 .

[5]  A. Fasana,et al.  A time-varying inertia pendulum: Analytical modelling and experimental identification , 2014 .

[6]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Adaptive blind signal and image processing , 2002 .

[7]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  FU Zhi-chao Modal parameter identification via robust second-order blind identification method , 2010 .

[9]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  An Alternating Least Squares (ALS) based Blind Source Separation Algorithm for Operational Modal Analysis , 2011 .

[10]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  Special issue: Blind source seperation - Editorial , 2005 .

[11]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Application of Independent Component Analysis and Blind Source Separation Techniques to Operational Modal Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Michael Feldman,et al.  Hilbert Transform Applications in Mechanical Vibration: Feldman/Hilbert Transform Applications in Mechanical Vibration , 2011 .

[13]  Wu Fang-gu Research on Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems Using Independent Component Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  A framework for blind modal identification using joint approximate diagonalization , 2008 .

[15]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  A study and extension of second-order blind source separation to operational modal analysis , 2013 .

[16]  J. Antoni Blind separation of vibration components: Principles and demonstrations , 2005 .

[17]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  Second Order Blind Source Separation techniques (SO-BSS) and their relation to Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) algorithm , 2011 .

[18]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Modified Cross-Correlation Method for the Blind Identification of Structures , 2010 .

[20]  P. Andersen,et al.  Understanding Stochastic Subspace Identification , 2006 .

[21]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Output-only modal analysis using blind source separation techniques , 2007 .

[22]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[23]  V. Arnold Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , 1974 .

[24]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[25]  Nguyen Viet Ha,et al.  Damage Detection Using Blind Source Separation Techniques , 2011 .

[26]  Jean-Francois Cardoso,et al.  Blind signal separation: statistical principles , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .