Flowable composites for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Results after five years.

[1]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  J. Roulet,et al.  Water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[3]  H O Heymann,et al.  Non-carious cervical lesions. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  A. Reis,et al.  Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  T. Burke,et al.  The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure , 2011, BDJ.

[7]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. , 2015, The international journal of esthetic dentistry.

[9]  J. Attal,et al.  Effectiveness of a new one-step self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice-based study. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  R. Hickel,et al.  Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[11]  D. Watts,et al.  Shrinkage behaviour of flowable resin-composites related to conversion and filler-fraction. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  K. Hiller,et al.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[14]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL)--a clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 2: restoration. , 2011, American journal of dentistry.

[15]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Dimethacrylate derivatives of dimer acid , 2006 .

[16]  C. R. Perez,et al.  Restoration of Noncarious Cervical Lesions: When, Why, and How , 2011, International journal of dentistry.

[17]  A. Mine,et al.  Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  Paul Brunton,et al.  Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical properties of "low-shrinkage" commercial resin composites. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  F. Tay,et al.  Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[22]  B Van Meerbeek,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[24]  M. Okazaki,et al.  Comparative Study on Adhesive Performance of Functional Monomers , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[25]  C M Kreulen,et al.  The analysis of restoration survival data in split-mouth designs. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[26]  David C Watts,et al.  Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  Stephen Bayne,et al.  FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[28]  K. Hiller,et al.  Flowable composites for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Three-year results. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[29]  T. Burke,et al.  The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 3, five-year survival , 2012, BDJ.

[30]  V. Rousson,et al.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[31]  K. V. Van Landuyt,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 2 years , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.