The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.

[1]  V. Wright,et al.  Bone and joint changes in lower limb amputees. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  S. Fisher,et al.  Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review. , 1978, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Skinner Hb,et al.  Gait analysis in amputees. , 1985 .

[4]  Herman J. Woltring,et al.  A fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation , 1986 .

[5]  E. Culham,et al.  Below-Knee Amputation: A Comparison of the Effect of the Sach Foot and Single Axis Foot on Electromyographic Patterns During Locomotion , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot™ Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot , 1991 .

[7]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Running gait impulse asymmetries in below-knee amputees , 1992, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  K. Siegel,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[9]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  E. Ayyappa,et al.  Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Lees,et al.  A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  J. Perry,et al.  The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  J. Perry,et al.  Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Philip E. Martin,et al.  Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic adaptations in unilateral below-knee amputees during walking , 1997 .

[17]  Perry,et al.  Knee kinetics in trans-tibial amputee gait. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[18]  W. Miller,et al.  The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  George N S Marinakis,et al.  Interlimb symmetry of traumatic unilateral transtibial amputees wearing two different prosthetic feet in the early rehabilitation stage. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Janice J Eng,et al.  A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  The prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis among veteran traumatic amputees and nonamputees. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.